Blood Tracks (1985)

Too much about the plot just didn't add up, the writing was bad, some of the scenes were cringey and awkward,

if their story seems completely bonkers, almost like a feverish work of fiction, you ain't heard nothing yet.

A terrific literary drama and character piece that shows how the process of creating art can be seen differently by those doing it and those looking at it from the outside.

An old-fashioned movie made with new-fashioned finesse.

Well, here's a slasher film that comes from Sweden for a change - but don't expect it to be less dumb than any of its American counterparts. BLOOD TRACKS is a pretty lively film, with a huge death count, and lots of sex and cheap gore effects to appeal to the exploitation crowd. It has its failings - much of the climax takes place in the dark, stupidly, so that you can't see a damn thing, although this may be a fault of the print (along with the awful pan and scan job here in the UK) - but no more so than any other low budget horror yarn from the period. As well as this it's short, has a fast pacing and an interesting isolated setting in the form of the spooky mountains, which I always like the use of in a horror film (whether it be THE ABOMINABLE SNOWMAN or THE WEREWOLF AND THE YETI!).The cast members are even more dumb than usual, with a group of people wandering around an old building at night and deciding to split up to search for a missing companion - yeah, that's clever. The female cast members are all vain and unlikable, and so are most of the men for that matter. It doesn't help that the truly hideous fashions and hairstyles have also dated badly since the time in which this was made. The dialogue sounds cheesy and overdubbed, although I do commend the film-makers for getting maximum use out of a piece of stock footage of an avalanche.The murders - despite being noticeably cut here in the UK - are all varied and kept interesting, as well as being short and to the point - there's little of that stalk-and-slash nonsense here. Characters are impaled, axed, burnt, shot, and fall foul of deadly traps. Of course, it's all done in the nastiest way possible. You can't feel too sorry for the truly stupid cast members, though, who decide to have sex in their log cabin while a family of murderers lurk around outside and occasionally peek through windows. Speaking of the bad guys, you almost feel sorry for them towards the end of the film! For some reason their faces have been dipped in oatmeal by the look of it. Although cheap and cheesy, I did get a kick out of BLOOD TRACKS, due to it being a straightforward celebration of death with minimal dialogue and lots of violent action.

Unquestionably one of the dumbest, dullest and most redundant slasher/exploitation hybrids of the entire 80's decade, "Blood Tracks" is a Swedish-American co-production that desperately attempts to cash in on the success of "The Hills Have Eyes" and other similar mountain-survival horror flicks, but tremendously fails. The most transparent problem of this film project is the lack of budget. The acting performances are weak, the choreography looks amateurish and – worst of all – three quarters of the film is shot without lighting. During practically all the death sequences, you find yourself staring at a fully black screen with only a bit of loud screaming in the background. The basic plot outline isn't too bad, actually – albeit very derivative – but in spite of this and the reasonably high body count, "Blood Tracks" is an insufferably boring and retarded 80's movie. The intro sequence is undeniably the best of the whole film, as a worried mother of three slays her alcoholic and abusive husband and flees into the snowy Colorado Mountains. Many years later (forty according the synopsis on the back flap of the DVD), a cheesy and ultimately gay rock band called "Solid Gold" journeys to the area, along with groupies and backing vocals, to record a video clip. Their atrocious music and annoying behavior quickly causes avalanches so immense they find themselves trapped and cut off from the world. The family from the intro, by now completely bewildered and having developed cannibalistic appetites, resides in a nearby abandoned factory and prepares for a luxurious smörgåsbord. The influence of "The Hills Have Eyes" is obvious, as it is even hinted at that the self-exiled family engaged in naughty inbred games, but they're not the least bit menacing or scary. The band members and their dim-witted entourage form the least amiable horror characters I have ever seen. They say imbecilic stuff (like "the snow is cold" and "hey, let's do it in the snow"), make stupid decisions and honestly deserve to die in the most painful ways imaginable. The Colorado filming locations – actually shot in rural Sweden – are beautiful to look at, but that's pretty much the only positive thing I can write about "Blood Tracks". They're quite a bit of sleaze and nudity, but none of the female cast members are attractive or sexy. If I remember correctly, even that dreadful similarly themed movie "Terror on Tour" was better than this.

OK, so this isn't SILENCE OF THE LAMBS or ALIEN. But what the heck is going on here with these viewer comments? I almost wonder if we all saw the same movie, which is indeed about a Swedish big hair heavy metal boy band (called Easy Action, in real life: their not half bad power ballad accompanies the closing credits) that travels into the frozen north to shoot part of a music video near a huge, creepy, evocative looking abandoned factory. A family of mutant hermits has taken refuge amidst the worn out machinery, broken down furnaces and endless catwalks. Various members of the video crew, band and their entourage of eye candy groupie babes wander into the abandoned factory where the hermits set upon them. Most are killed (though nobody gets eaten) and some of the women taken prisoner back to the hermit's hovel, presumably for mating purposes that are not explored on camera. Thank God.When evaluating this actually quite watchable film over three or four screenings I noted that it's really two movies in one, and what I think is going on here with the other user comments is that folks are being distracted by the seeming awfulness of the first movie -- the big hair boy band shooting their video -- and ignoring the second -- the fight for survival inside of this immense abandoned factory. And they are letting their (understandable) disdain for the whole 80s arena metal big hair band thing cloud their judgment over the ENTIRE production, 2/3rds of which has little to do with the rock band. Their groupie girls still parade around half nude or better for the entire length of the show, some of the killings are rather ingenious (though sadly even the longer 85 minute print of the film I located seems cut for a few seconds of explicit gore) but there is a sort of ambiguous quality about the family of hermits that makes their fate somewhat bittersweet.The family is apparently the same people shown in the very beginning of the film where an abused Swedish house mom kills her husband in a pique of self defense, then flees the scene with her four toddler kids. Who then presumably grow up to be the mutant, fur wearing hermits seen during the bulk of the film. The one problem I had with the movie's logic was how did they get so mutated but the mom remained more or less unscathed? The male hermits are all covered with festering sores, leprosy like skin diseases and scuttle about like creatures from a post apocalyptic wasteland thriller. The director, Swedish filmmaker Mats Helge, apparently had an affinity for the subject of a deformed hermit living in dehumanizing conditions who lashes out against it's invasion by technically advanced pop culturists as seen in his 1991 film FORGOTTEN WELLS, which seems to be a distillation of BLOOD TRACKS' more successful themes. The comparison to THE HILLS HAVE EYES is indeed valid, but how did these cretins end up as we see them? Interestingly the story paints them as victims who have simply become territorial, staked out this abandoned factory and only start killing off the rock band entourage when their territory is violated by people who ignore a big KEEP OUT THIS STRUCTURE HAS BEEN CONDEMNED sign. If you ignore stuff like that you sort of deserve whatever fates await you, and the abandoned factory set is very cool looking, well selected as a real world location, and handled like a creepy woodland camp setting. A lot of the action in the film actually reminded me of ALIENS with it's carnage scenes set in labyrinths of industrial type structures of inter-crossing catwalks, yawning abysses, shafts of unnatural lighting and atmosphere of disused & decaying metal. There are certain segments like the one with a victim being lit on fire and falling off a catwalk that seem to have anticipated some of ALIENS' action sequences: Did Gale Anne Hurd manage to catch BLOOD TRACKS and find inspiration? It comes from the damndest places sometimes ...I don't say this movie is actually "good", but it IS interesting, and for 1980s slasher type horror that isn't a common trait. I like how different the setting and style of film-making feels when compared to your usual Summer Camp Horror slasher. There is also a weird juxtaposition of these disfigured mutants stalking fashion oriented metal groupies around a cold, dank, dilapidated factory. And the concluding images actually contain an homage to the 1977 Yul Brynner vehicle THE ULTIMATE WARRIOR which again re-enforces the post apocalyptic thing. Maybe in it's original Swedish form this was meant to be a post industrial paranoia picture about how the materialistic youth culture of the 1980s had turned their back on the traditions of industry, then find themselves haunted by it's ghosts in the form of this family of mutants. The leader of which actually seems to make a gesture of religious atonement during the closing moments ... Or does he? See, the movie leaves some interesting questions unanswered in an interesting way, and each subsequent viewing reveals new elements you maybe missed the first time. Usually a slasher film is a cut & dried affair, what you see is what you get, but there seems to be something going on here in this movie that appears to exceed the sum of it's parts. And you can't blame the Swedish for liking their power ballad arena rock bands.6/10: Worth seeking out for being somewhat different, which should always be considered a good thing.

I found this title about a year ago in a charity shop for 50p, I though at the time this looked interesting, how wrong was I.For a Slasher flick this is really poor, and fails on every possible level such as Acting? Crap!! FX? Shite!! Story? Poop!! Setting? Excrement!! A clear rip off to "The Hills Have Eyes" which is far more superior. In fairness to this stank Swedish meatball of a flick I do believe that I may have screened the CUT version as most of the gore seemed snipped, either that or it was edited using pruning shears, which for all I know may have been the case. I would however be interested in re-screening an UNCUT version if there is one. Hey, I'm sure it would still gobble cock but at least there might be a little gore to break up the monotony of porn flick acting and home movie FX.All in all I'd say stay well clear of this travesty.