Home > Horror >

Witchcraft VII: Judgement Hour

AD:This title is currently not available on Prime Video
Free Trial
View All Sources

Witchcraft VII: Judgement Hour (1995)

December. 27,1995
|
2.9
| Horror
AD:This title is currently not available on Prime Video
Free Trial
View All Sources

Will Spanner is at it again battling sex starved beautiful demon vampires in the seventh installment of this series. Will enlists the help of cops Lutz and Garner to bring down the evil vampire Martin and his beautiful erotic demonic slaves

...

Watch Trailer

Free Trial Channels

AD
Show More

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

Rijndri
1995/12/27

Load of rubbish!!

More
ChicDragon
1995/12/28

It's a mild crowd pleaser for people who are exhausted by blockbusters.

More
ChanFamous
1995/12/29

I wanted to like it more than I actually did... But much of the humor totally escaped me and I walked out only mildly impressed.

More
StyleSk8r
1995/12/30

At first rather annoying in its heavy emphasis on reenactments, this movie ultimately proves fascinating, simply because the complicated, highly dramatic tale it tells still almost defies belief.

More
Michael_Elliott
1995/12/31

Witchcraft 7: Judgment Hour (1995) 1/2 (out of 4) Everyone's beloved hero Will Spanner (David Byrnes) is back but this time he needs a break from all those creepy and mean Satan worshipers. So, this time out Will decides to battle a vampire cult who like taking their clothes off as much as they can (and biting people every once in a while). As I make my way through the series it's clear that the films themselves aren't very good but thankfully up until this one they were at least entertaining in a bad way. This seventh entry is just downright awful on pretty much every level and this includes the non-stop sex scenes, all of which are shot in slow motion, which means a longer running time and more torture for the viewer. What we've basically got is about ten-minutes worth of plot and the rest sex scenes. Even for such a cheap series the adult scenes were usually at least somewhat erotic but that's not the case here. The scenes are shot very ugly, usually just a close-up of the girl's butt and none of them create any sparks. Even the nudity gets boring around the twenty-minute mark but I'm going to guess that this contains more nudity than most of the softcore pictures from this era. The vampire stuff is all rather silly and adds up to nothing. Byrnes really doesn't bring any energy to the role of Will and the supporting cast is just as forgetful. What's strange about this entry is that they bring back the two detectives from the previous film but this time they're played by different actors. That's not too shocking as this happens in low-budget movies but the weird thing is that one of the detectives is now played as a woman!

More
movieman_kev
1996/01/01

Will Spanner (David Byrnes, the fifth actor to play the role in the series) stumbles onto another bizarre case, this time involving vampires rather than the usual witches, warlocks & demons (he's at the hospital to check on his friend's son who got hurt in a hit and run when they wheel a girl who's been attacked by a vamp in). He brings in Detectve Lutz to help out with the case which revolves around a clandestine vampire organization trying to get a business merger to go through to let them legally own all the blood banks in the world or some such nonsense.The plot of this movie pretty much takes a backseat to the nudity & simulated sex scenes. (As is to be expected from this series, i guess). So complaining about the lack of good acting, or compelling plot-line, or even convincing characters, I suspect, would fall on deaf ears. If you're watching this film, you don't care about such 'frivolities' and just want some 'action'. Sadly on that front the film fails as well. All the woman are attractive enough but the way the scenes are filmed are just atrocious. Making this more or less an exercise in futility in every conceivable way.Eye Candy: Both Kimberly Blair & April Breneman show everything; Ashlie Rhey shows full- frontal; Aline Kassman & Mai-Lis Holmes only shows their breastsMy Grade: D

More
brandonsites1981
1996/01/02

Will Spaner the warlock from parts 1-6 returns yet again for what has now got to be the longest (and worst) running horror film series in history. This entry finds Will having to do battle with some pesky vampires who are now overrunning LA.Lousy premise is almost laughable, the acting and effects even worse. Directed with a bit more flair then the first 6, but still this series at this point is only about sex and this one has plenty of it. Unrated; Strong Sexual Content, Violence, Profanity, and Nudity.

More
bigpappa1--2
1996/01/03

This was supposed to be the final sequel in this awful series of films. But, guess what? They lied.Story involves Will Spaner fighting off a vampire that is trying to close a business deal that could give him great powers. The stories in this series just keep getting worse and worse. The acting and direction are non-existent. The film looks cheap and the effects are some of the worse ever. I wonder what the filmmakers are trying to do? Make more sequels for a series of films, than any other series of films. Avoid this film at all cost. Rating: 1 out of 10.

More