Unacknowledged (2017)

Terrible acting, screenplay and direction.

everything you have heard about this movie is true.

Instead, you get a movie that's enjoyable enough, but leaves you feeling like it could have been much, much more.

Go in cold, and you're likely to emerge with your blood boiling. This has to be seen to be believed.

Usually the run on the mill UFO/Guverment conspiracy documenary type goes between some poor limits and 90% of serious people can't take them seriously. But, man, this guy, takes bs to a higher, never seen level. His so called documentary is one lie bigger the the previous one from on end to another. Plus he made a terrible mistake, he presented Dr. Carl Sagan as being accomplice with aliens and government, hiding big secrets !! How can one insult Carl Sagan in this terrible way ? I think this guy either doesn't have a clue who Carl Sagan ws or he is delusional altogether. I watched it because I wanted to see how far can he go, and boy, he did it, all the way and back with his bs. How can one sane man think that, just for flagging in his hands some pages, which HE says are real documents, and interviewing some nobodies which no one know, we will believe him ? How stupid can be a human being to believe this crap ? Well i know what you're thinking, this guy is the opposite of a conspiracy biggot etc etc. I will give you an example to taste Greer bullshit: he says in the beginning of the movie that the conspirators, not just they made contact with alien civilisations, but they already duplicated their technology and made ships identical etc, but he forgot to tell us WHERE did they made those ships, what are they made of, and if they copy alien technology , where did they have the materials to make them... Laughable isn't it ? And that's just one of its crazy ideas. Dr. Steve Greer, if you read this, take my advice, stick to what you really know, traumatology, and stop lieng us all and insulting with your lies and proofs of stupidity. Thank you.

Even though I would like to believe that most of what is said in this documentary is true, there is something that always bothers me about all alien documentaries: we are almost 8 billion humans. It is estimated that 44% of us owns a smartphone. So you can say there are roughly 3 billion smartphones out there, all capable of capturing footage and posting it online. So why is it that UFO footage is always from a distance, in a low definition, poorly focused and shaky? We have portable devices today capable of capturing HD quality videos, but all we see are these blurry, dodgy quality videos that seem to have come from an old VHS tape in your basement. Yeah, of course, if you are making a video of a UFO, you'll most likely be shaking and nervous and that could affect the quality of the footage, but wouldn't at least SOME of the videos be crystal clear and good quality? Makes you wonder. All in all, good conspiracy documentary. Not a waste of time.

99 percent of this movie(?) is pure fabrication with no evidence to back anything up. It is interesting to get a glimpse into Greer's fantastic imagination though. I have a question for him; why is it that we have not had any UFO sightings this decade when nearly everyone on earth has a camera/video recorder with them at all times?

This film starts out as a very believable film, with proof and evidence galore then about an hour into the film it transitions from believable to out right ridiculous. From connecting dots to Marilyn Monroe's involvement in aliens and JFK and all that nonsense with the main storyteller to start talking about shadow people in one scene he talks about when they told him that a bullet has your name on it and so forth. It always seems to be in these sorts of films that it comes down to the men in black to "threaten the family" or "threaten the friend" or "threaten the co-worker" type of storytelling to make their story appear to be the absolute truth. But in reality this is just one person talking in front of a camera. With this being said, these people telling their personal stories and encounters sound a bit like science fiction not science fact. There are multiple era's of clips all slung together like they were all shot in 2017 the release year of this film. But that's the part that people are not seeing, clips are taken from interviews from many different decades, you can tell by the way the screen is stretched to make it look widescreen, also some interviews you could tell they were transferred from analogue to digital. This is very sloppy editing and quite frankly makes this film feel more like the television broadcast called Alien Autopsy starring Jonathan Frakes, we all know what became of that idiocy. I for one can't believe one word of what this person is telling the audience. Now don't get me wrong I do believe in aliens or just people existing on other planets or other realms but this film is just nonsense and they try to connect aliens to everyone that seems to have made a mark in the history of history especially the Marilyn Monroe portion of the film. Seriously a drug overdose now it's because of aliens and knowing they exist? Come on people I am not this stupid or naive about any of this information.