Home > Western >

Buckskin

AD:This title is currently not available on Prime Video
Free Trial
View All Sources

Buckskin (1968)

May. 01,1968
|
5.4
|
NR
| Western
AD:This title is currently not available on Prime Video
Free Trial
View All Sources

A Montana marshal fights a land baron out to parch homesteaders with a spite dam.

...

Watch Trailer

Free Trial Channels

AD
Show More

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

Harockerce
1968/05/01

What a beautiful movie!

More
Gutsycurene
1968/05/02

Fanciful, disturbing, and wildly original, it announces the arrival of a fresh, bold voice in American cinema.

More
Brennan Camacho
1968/05/03

Mostly, the movie is committed to the value of a good time.

More
Phillida
1968/05/04

Let me be very fair here, this is not the best movie in my opinion. But, this movie is fun, it has purpose and is very enjoyable to watch.

More
JohnHowardReid
1968/05/05

There's only one thing that distinguishes this A.C. Lyles western from the rest of that producer's crop: This one was not filmed in some shonky widescreen process but lensed in ordinary 35mm – cropped top and bottom for widescreen projection in cinemas. But otherwise, it's the same again. In fact, if anything, it's less appealing. "Buckskin" has a very talky screenplay with a bit of action – mostly at the climax (and even that is somewhat tame, considering the large amount of talk that has gone before). A few outdoor locations have also been utilized – all photographed in somewhat under-lit color. These are interspersed with some obviously studio streets, housing a great collection of old character actors, some of whom appear on screen but briefly. Richard Arlen, for instance, has only one scene, and Joan Caulfield makes a very late entrance. However, she has survived the years better than most, including Barbara Hale. Corey and Chaney act their roles with villainous relish, but Sullivan makes no more than an okay hero in this tepid piece which Michael Moore's slow-paced, TV-style direction using an abundance of unnecessary close-ups, does nothing to improve.

More
bkoganbing
1968/05/06

Buckskin is yet another western where A.C. Lyles provides employment for famous Hollywood players past their prime. Barry Sullivan is the star here, a US Marshal come to a small Montana town with specific intent of taking down town boss Wendell Corey. For reasons I can't explain he brings his young son to the town and quite frankly had I been him I'd not have brought a child into harm's way. And since the child's mother who is deceased was an Indian all the more reason.I wasn't completely clear why Corey wants the homesteaders out of the area, he's dammed up the stream that they get water for their crops. We know a railroad is coming through the following year, but that's all.What Corey has done is pit the miners against the homesteaders and the homesteaders have their families. Not much of a fair fight, in the end though Sullivan has an ace.Some grievous plot holes is made up for a nice bit of action specifically when Sullivan blows up the dam and also in the final shootout. Joan Caulfield is the former schoolteacher turned saloon girl who Sullivan redeems. Such other A.C. Lyles regulars as Lon Chaney, Jr., John Russell, and Richard Arlen are in the cast. Bill Williams and Barbara Hale, husband and wife in real life, play a husband and wife here and I'm not sure if this isn't the only time that happened. I know Williams did a couple of Perry Mason guest shots while Hale was playing Della Street.I like the A.C. Lyles westerns even some of the bad ones and this is not a completely bad one.

More
MartinHafer
1968/05/07

A.C. Lyles made a career out of cheap westerns during the 1960s which starred actors well past their glory days. My assumption is that these folks would work cheaply and needed the money. Most of these films are what you might refer to as 'Geriatric Westerns'. Some are pretty good despite the low budgets (such as "Fort Utah" and "Johnny Reno") and some are a bit sad, as some of the actors were not only well past their primes but also sad alcoholics. In this film, Lon Chaney Jr. looks pretty bad due to his drinking problems (though this fits the character he's playing as well) but even worse was Wendell Corey. Corey died that same year at only 54--and he looked 65 or 70. And, you can see that he sometimes was reading lines from cue cards because he could no longer remember lines and you can see his hand shake if you watch carefully. It's very, very sad to see these two. As for the rest of the old-timers, you get a chance to see Barry Sullivan (in the lead), Barton MacLane (in his last role), Richard Arlen (who seemed to be in every Lyles western) and Joan Caulfield.As for the plot, it's #3. I say that because in most westerns, there are about 3 or 4 plots that are used and re-used again and again. This one is the clichéd 'evil boss-man'--the guy who wants to use his hired stooges in order to drive out the ranchers in order to own EVERYTHING. It is a very tired plot--and it made it harder for the actors to do their jobs. Unfortunately, the writer stuck with convention. When the evil boss-man (Corey) approached the Marshall (Sullivan) and threatened to kill him (as often happened in such films)...why didn't Sullivan either arrest him or just shoot him in the face?! This would have ended the problem 10 minutes into the film!! I sure would have shot him! It all limps to a predictable finale but along the way there are some silly scenes (such as when Sullivan was bitten by a rattlesnake and seemed amazingly well soon after--in reality, his arm would have swollen up and he would have been lucky if he'd only lost it!). Another odd problem was the hired gun played very well by John Russell. He only has one eye--so how can he be an expert shot?! What about his depth perception? And what about the very invasive background music?! The film also has some 1960s sensibilities--with the Marshall having a son who is half-Indian and the Marshall protects a poor Chinese guy who is being attacked by the town's thugs)--which isn't bad, but is also a bit anachronistic. Sadly, back in the 1880s (or so), I can't imagine anyone like the Marshall.So is the clichéd film worth seeing? Well, for Barry Sullivan fans, yes. Although he was NOT a western star, he did very well here. I also liked that he wasn't the usual ultra-good looking or macho hero. But despite this, the film never was able to rise above mediocrity. Not terrible...but it could have been a lot better.

More
Marlburian
1968/05/08

Not all bad for a late (1968) version of a familiar theme, with an interesting cast - not least the normally aggressive Leo Gordon playing one of the world's losers (though he does toughen up later on).The only real fault was the way that several characters' attitudes changed rather too quickly from being antagonistic towards the marshal to supporting him. And didn't Sullivan recover quickly from his night of fever after his rattlesnake bite; apparently he nearly died twice, but the next morning he was fit and ready for his concluding heroics.Wendell Corey does very well as the town boss, and I wish we had seen more of John Russell in Westerns; he has the longest speech in the film when explaining his "history" with Sullivan, and he puts it over well.

More