I'm Not Jesus Mommy (2011)

Terrible acting, screenplay and direction.

The plot isn't so bad, but the pace of storytelling is too slow which makes people bored. Certain moments are so obvious and unnecessary for the main plot. I would've fast-forwarded those moments if it was an online streaming. The ending looks like implying a sequel, not sure if this movie will get one

Ok... Let's be honest. It cannot be the best movie but is quite enjoyable. The movie has the potential to develop a great plot for future movies

This movie feels like it was made purely to piss off people who want good shows

This was re-released in 2012 under the title Devil's Angel. produced by Fortaleza Filmwork and distributed by Warner Brothers.Language: English Region: Region 1 (U.S. and Canada only) Rated: R (Restricted) Studio: Maverick Entertainment Group DVD Release Date: November 13, 2012 Run Time: 86 minutesPlot: Kimberly is the mother of the world's first successful human clone, a son named David. Seven years after his birth the Earth is plagued with war, famine, and natural disasters that seem to be emanating from the young boy himself.Review: After illegally implanting herself so she can have a baby, a woman pays for it later along with everyone else as the future deteriorates in the US. There is a connection between this and her young son, shown later at age 7, but you can guess what it is from the DVD cover. Creepy, and eerily shot with 35mm and some deliberate lack of focus.

If it were only the mangled science and the poorly crafted ending, I would rate this movie higher. I found it on Hulu listed as Horror, but that doesn't do it justice. The movie is a horror on so many levels. Other reviewers have noted the scientific issues, along with the less-than-stellar production values, so I won't repeat those criticisms here. My primary concern is the bad theology on which the film is based. Theologically, the film fails. The early scenes in the military compound/lab are obviously anti-abortion, and the idea that women could be forced to participate in the experiment because they are undocumented immigrants reeks of a cross between Nazism and Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale. There is also a strong tendency toward the judgmental, punishing God of Pat Robertson and his ilk, and very little by way of the God who loved the world so much as to send Jesus to save it.

First off, I'm always the type to push myself to watch every movie through to it's end, some will surprise you and the ending will make it all worth it. Sometimes. But not in the case of this movie. As many have already mentioned there are numerous factual errors that will make even the most polite and grounded viewers roll their eyes. The acting is soap opera bad. Something's up and the character will give that 'who farted' stare. Honestly, the child is probably the best actor in this movie. The movie jumps '7 years' into the future with hardly any explanation as to what's going on. You realize it's the end of times but wouldn't a story of how we have gotten to that point been more interesting than watching s guy tell his sister and niece they have to ask the lord for forgiveness? I won't lie and say the plot of the movie has some promise but that promise is translated into a wreck of a movie with acting that will make you laugh. I've seen kids fake cough with more convincing execution. Bad movie but if you have nothing better to do than gouge your eyes out with spoons take this turd for a drive.

Huge Spoiler Alert!I would probably never watch this movie again but there is something to say for the fact that I watched the entire thing so it wasn't that bad...but Im not exactly a movie critic either. I think the biggest problem with this movie is most peoples inability to process the information...or lack of it, and gain an understanding. Most people want to be told a story thats somewhat believable...a story that could almost be true. I think on one level this story is that story that could almost be true but we are missing some hints or foreshadowing that can give a tighter grip on who exactly David is. How frustrating! I HATE endings that tell me nothing. This movie appears to do just that. However, after racking my brain to figure it out, I think I get it...and the movie could be genius with people just not realizing it. Depends on directors/writers knowledge and how they were meaning to play it. This is my opinion that I wrote on another forum discussing some questions people had about certain things in the movie. Its on who David is in this movie...more specifically if he is evil or not.The basic plot is set upon biblical apocalypse theory. It is set in pre-tribulation days and/or during tribulation. Tribulation is a time period when famine and disease will sweep the world and basically a spiritual battle for people is waged, hence the sores that suddenly appear on their skin, lack of food, etc. The disappearing people are a biblical reference to the rapture. Those who know Christ as their savior will be raptured (brought straight to heaven...there are differing theories on when during tribulation this will happen). At first I assumed that Davids friend was evil but I am not so sure. IMO his friend is an angel...I just don't know, for sure, if he is a fallen angel or a heavenly angel/messenger. David is not the anti-Christ or spawn of Satan because he is not old enough. Tribulation lasts 7 years I think. According to the bible, the anti-Christ is an adult leader or king of some sort at the start. According to the actions of David, I would say he is a heavenly angel/messenger. Evil likes to take full control and destroy and we don't see that in Davids case. Now, does that mean it is not a lower ranking demon (fallen angel)? Who knows. David, brings his mouse friend back to life, he says he will bring his mother back to life, and of course, he tells the doc that God would not like what he is doing and tells him what his greatest sin is. Nothing that points to evil unless David was directly causing the doc to shoot his mother or himself. The director doesn't make it clear what the spiritual or unseen forces are here so it is hard to make the decision on David based on those instances. David also does not seem to suffer from any of the pestilences or famine (he doesn't eat) and he rises from the dead without any seeming help. Based on the superficial evidence presented, I say David has a holy protector since he is from holy blood. I don't think we have enough evidence on the unseen to read between the lines and be able to come to a consensus...it will be pure opinion. As for why his mother doesn't want to be revived. For those who know great suffering and know what awaits them in the kingdom of heaven, there is no greater longing than for that of death. It is the absoluteness of her choice in Christ. I think its possible David is happy that his mother chose Christ and hence the rapture. He didn't seem real convincing when he was saying "let me save you mommy" and he wasn't too depressed that she was gone. It could be argued that he was emotionally disconnected but if that was the case, he would have had no desire to assert to her that he would save her when he asked her if she was dying. He would have no concern for her death at all. The clincher for me is when David is baptized. Now this would all depend on the directors knowledge of Christian symbolism and/or which direction he intended to play on. He is marked on the forehead with an upside down cross. I personally think the director is playing on the normal persons ignorance of the meaning of that. Most people would see the burned mark and think the holy water burned him because he is evil (think spraying holy water on a possessed person during an exorcism) and the upside down cross is in defiance of God. There is a reference in the bible of Christians being marked on the forehead. There is also a reference of people having the mark of the beast (satan) on their forehead/ hand. It would be easy to once again go back to the idea that it could be either or, BUT...the mark David bears is not one associated with the beast. Contrary to public opinion, the upside down cross is not in defiance of Christ. It was actually the personal symbol of a saint or pope (I don't remember who) that was crucified. He requested to be crucified upside down because he did not see himself worthy of dying the way Christ did. It is a symbol of humility and unworthiness...hence the title " I am not Jesus Mommy". I don't think he is saying "Im the opposite of Jesus"...I think he is implying he is a humble servant.Again this is just my opinion and I could have missed something or misinterpreted but I think its half the fun trying to figure it out. I would just like to possibly give some peace to a mind that is frustrated with this movie.