Star! (1968)

I like the storyline of this show,it attract me so much

Although it has its amusing moments, in eneral the plot does not convince.

In other words,this film is a surreal ride.

a film so unique, intoxicating and bizarre that it not only demands another viewing, but is also forgivable as a satirical comedy where the jokes eventually take the back seat.

The curtain opens and an orchestra plays "Star!" music. Behind the curtain is a collage of stage plays, which we see in different colored tints. Next, an old-fashioned newsreel introduces the setting as London in the early 1900s. The legendary Gertrude Lawrence is born to a theatrical family. She meets young Noel Coward. We flash-forward to 1940 and meet diva-like Julie Andrews (as Gertrude "Gertie" Lawrence), as directed by Robert Wise. This is their story. There are many well-staged musical numbers, but sketchy ebb and flow to Ms. Lawrence's career; it looks like most plays were lavishly-produced hits. A variety of men appear, with producer Richard Crenna most notable. We assume, from the introduction, Daniel Massey's "Noel Coward" will be the main romantic interest; later, we realize he's not...The original, long version of "Star!" was tucked away for many years, after it was a notorious flop and re-released in heavily edited form. Absence makes the heart grow fonder and people have warmed up to the old stager. In almost every case, overly long bad movies benefit from a period of time when they are considered "lost" classics..."Star!" is still the same movie, with the same problems. The structure of the film (flashbacks, newsreels and costume changes) isn't bad, but the newsreels become tiresome clutter, after the first few. The story has no heart or soul. Andrews' characterization is aloof and unrealized. Eventually, this becomes Julie Andrews in a series of well-produced skits. If we had more of an investment in the story or its increasingly unlikable lead character, we would more likely sit for three hours of songs and scenes from her life. They should have flash-backed from 1951, not 1940. Andrews collapsing after a tune from "The King and I" would have given audiences much more interest and investment in the character. Highlights include "Burlington Bertie", "Jenny" (both assisted by Michael Kidd) and the memorable title song.***** Star! (7/18/68) Robert Wise ~ Julie Andrews, Daniel Massey, Richard Crenna, Robert Reed

So yes, Julie Andrews was now known for "Mary Poppins" and "The Sound of Music". Therefore, they thought that they could cast her in similar roles for perpetuity. The result was the eye-rolling "Star!", about an actress with whom most people were probably unfamiliar by 1968. Maybe Gertrude Lawrence was once a household name, but the public's taste in movies had completely changed by 1968 (as seen by the releases of "2001: A Space Odyssey" and "Night of the Living Dead"). In fact, the opening scene simply shows an orchestra playing next to a screen with a bunch of seemingly random phrases scrawled on it (they were apparently musicals in which Lawrence acted, but there's no indication given).The point is that "Star!" is the sort of movie that belongs on "Mystery Science Theater 3000". Of course, if you've read my reviews, then you'll know that I watch musicals only so that I can heckle them like Mike, Servo and Crow do the crummy flicks sent them by Dr. Forrester and TV's Frank (and that includes "Mary Poppins" and "The Sound of Music"). Robert Wise's having directed "The Day the Earth Stood Still", "The Haunting", "The Andromeda Strain" and "Audrey Rose" makes it hard to figure out how he wasted himself on this.Long story short, just avoid "Star!", or it'll be three hours that you'll never get back. If the movie has any interesting aspects, it's some of the cast members. Aside from Richard Crenna (the commanding officer in the first Rambo movie), there's also Robert Reed (the "Brady Bunch" dad) and a young Jenny Agutter (the nurse in "An American Werewolf in London").

Given that STAR! was cruelly dismissed by critics and public in 1968, I was surprised to find that despite its length, it does entertain with a fine performance by JULIE ANDREWS as the famous stage performer (who did occasional films) and by RICHARD CRENNA and DANIEL MASSEY in good supporting roles.Andrews makes the most of every musical number--and there are plenty of them--demonstrating her enormous talent along with a flair for a more sophisticated style of acting miles apart from her "Mary Poppins" or "Sound of Music" image. And the staging of these musical portions makes excellent use of the WideScreen photography, emphasizing the lavish budget expended on costumes and sets.The central reason for the film's lukewarm reception at the box office is surely the fact that no attempt is made to make Miss Lawrence a truly likable person. She is shown, flaws and all, throughout--quarreling with those around her as she puts herself, first and foremost, above all other considerations. It seems that only Richard Crenna (as the man she eventually marries) is able to stand up to her stubborn nature with a will of his own.Coming on the heels of Julie's outstanding success in previous musicals, it's easy to see why audiences found it difficult to accept her as Gertude Lawrence--when actually, she gives a very strong performance. The script has to share some of the blame. It's a lumbering thing as it attempts to frame the story with newsreel accounts of Lawrence's life before ending the tidbits of information by delving into the main structure of the story.For fans of Julie who enjoy hearing her belt out song after song in various stages of Miss Lawrence's career, the film does homage to Julie Andrews herself more than to the famous stage thespian.

'The Sound of Music', starring Julie Andrews and directed by Robert Wise, became (for its time) the biggest box-office smash in movie history. 'Star!', a big-budget musical tailor-made for Andrews and directed by Wise for the same studio (20th Century-Fox), was expected to be a second bite of the cherry ... but it sank like a stone. This film flopped so thuddingly, one critic joked that Andrews's next movie would be a musical biography of Al Capone, titled 'Scar!'.'Star!' is the alleged life story of Gertrude Lawrence. In 1968, few movie-goers knew her name: Lawrence was primarily a stage performer, and her few films are seldom revived. In 'Star!', the only reference to Lawrence's screen career is a brief shot of Andrews wearing a copy of Lawrence's costume from 'Rembrandt'. Next offence: During the overture, there is a long long boring static shot of an orchestra against a backdrop emblazoned with some seemingly arbitrary phrases: 'Susan and God', 'Tonight at 8.30', 'Nymph Errant' and so forth. (I'm omitting one phrase from this description; I'll return to it later.) Movie-goers in 1968 were unlikely to recognise these phrases. In fact, these are the titles of Lawrence's stage vehicles (some from Broadway, some from the West End) ... and, after the overture, most of them are never mentioned anywhere in this film!We get that hardy cliché of movie bios: the subject is first seen in middle age, then the rest of the film is in flashback from the subject's youth or childhood. Most biopics do this as a technical necessity: James Cagney was in his forties when he played George M Cohan in 'Yankee Doodle Dandy', so we first see Cagney (in appropriate make-up) as the older Cohan; then, after the audience have accepted that Cagney is Cohan, we see the middle-aged Cagney portraying Cohan in his younger years. But this device wasn't necessary in 'Star!': Julie Andrews was young enough and fit enough to give a convincing portrayal of the young Lawrence. Yet the opening sequence gives us Andrews in dowager make-up (lamb dressed as mutton?), playing Lawrence at the oldest we'll ever see her in this movie, cueing the flashback to her youth. Also cueing an excellent title song: the only original song in this movie.Gertrude Lawrence was a notorious scene-stealer, reluctant to share the limelight. 'Star!' appears to have scripted as if seeking Lawrence's personal approval. In real life, Lawrence became a Broadway star in 'Charlot's Revue', co-starring with Jack Buchanan and Beatrice Lillie. In 'Star!', Buchanan is a mere dancing footnote, while Lillie (whom Gertrude Lawrence despised in her later years, after their early friendship) isn't even mentioned. When Andrews as Lawrence stars in 'Lady in the Dark', there's no mention of Danny Kaye ... who became a star in that production, and who famously had to defend himself against Lawrence's scene-stealing techniques. (Andrews gives a splendid and sexy rendition here -- surely much sexier than Lawrence's original -- of 'The Saga of Jenny', Lawrence's show-stopper from 'Lady in the Dark'.)I was delighted by Julie Andrews's performance (in male drag) of 'Burlington Bertie from Bow' ... but this song is not to my knowledge a Gertrude Lawrence speciality. The song was written for Vesta Tilley, referencing an earlier song performed by Ella Shields. Bunging it into a movie about Gertrude Lawrence would be like casting James Cagney as George M Cohan but then having him sing 'Mammy' and 'If You Knew Suzie'.Any biopic of Gertrude Lawrence must include Noël Coward. He's brilliantly played here by his godson, Daniel Massey. Massey's duet with Andrews on 'Has Anybody Seen Our Ship?' is delightful. On the one and only occasion when I met Noël Coward, his eyes lighted up with pleasure when I asked him about Gertrude Lawrence. It was clear that he deeply and sincerely loved her ... other factors in his personal life notwithstanding.This too-long movie falters when the music stops and Andrews as Gertie Lawrence descends into soap-opera argle-bargle. We get Gertie in a scene with the teenage daughter whom she has largely ignored in her pursuit of the limelight. The daughter is touchingly played by the young Jenny Agutter, unfortunately in an outfit that displays the birthmark on her sternum. After we've seen Lawrence shove aside everyone who got between her and the spotlight, we now hear her lamenting that all she ever really wanted was (pause, wistful smile, half-formed sob) to be truly LOVED!I mentioned that the overture curtain contained one phrase that modern audiences would recognise. That's 'The King and I', Gertrude Lawrence's last Broadway vehicle (now perceived as a vehicle for Yul Brynner). That phrase on the curtain is the ONLY time that 'The King and I' is mentioned in 'Star!'. We never see Lawrence performing in a scene from that musical. Were Fox unwilling to have Julie Andrews share the screen with Yul Brynner? Or unwilling to have another actor impersonate Brynner? Lawrence's stint in 'The King and I' is especially poignant, as she was dying of cancer during the Broadway run ... but you'd never know it from watching 'Star!'. The biopic ends arbitrarily, with Gertrude yammering during a motor trip: 'Lady in the Dark' behind her and 'The King and I!' still unmentioned.In the original production of 'The King and I', Gertrude Lawrence was billed over Yul Brynner. On her deathbed, Lawrence's dying request was that Brynner be given top billing. All the people who knew the selfish Lawrence were awed by this act of generosity. To which I say: Rubbish! It wasn't generosity at all, since giving top billing to Brynner would have meant taking it away from Lawrence's replacement (Constance Carpenter), not from Lawrence herself. The real Gertrude Lawrence was phony and superficial ... and so is this movie. I'll rate it 4 in 10, for the superb production values ... and for Julie Andrews's passion for this period in showbiz history.