Rose Of Death (2007)
On prom night ten years ago, a group of drunken friends go too far when trying to scare a couple of their fellow classmates. After accidentally killing one of them, they decide they have to kill the other one in order to cover up the crime and protect themselves and their futures. Now, ten years later, as they start coming together for their high school reunion, each member of the group is being picked off one by one by a ghostly killer as some sort of revenge from beyond the grave.
Watch Trailer
Free Trial Channels
Cast
Reviews
ridiculous rating
Critics,are you kidding us
It's entirely possible that sending the audience out feeling lousy was intentional
While it is a pity that the story wasn't told with more visual finesse, this is trivial compared to our real-world problems. It takes a good movie to put that into perspective.
Christ almighty, this movie is an absolute waste of time. And I only watched a few minutes! The script is appallingly bad ("There's more to him than sex, Jake!" Well done), the actors are useless, the directing is plain. It was just awful. I feel partly sorry for the actors having to endure the script and I'm sure even Two and a Half Men would be a more witty read. I got so bored of listening to Kevin and Rose blathering on about how she was shallow and switched it off. There isn't much else to comment on except for the rape scene which made me laugh uncontrollably. Now, I'm sorry to be harsh but, frankly, the director/writer should just stop while they're behind. I would recommend it to... no one.
A group of teens brutalizes and kills a young couple on Prom night only to have them return to exact revenge 10 years later. This movie comes across as a student film. It is predictable, made on the cheap and every character is shallow.The plot is derivative of 80's horror movies, and the dialogue doesn't seem plot related at all - it purely exists to string together the very brief slasher scenes There is no cinematic tension, and the synthesizer score really grates after only a few minutes.Compared to other really low budget horrors, I guess at least the acting was on par, but that wasn't enough to save this film.I have to say I wasn't expecting a lot from this movie, and it delivered nothing in spades.Save your money and more importantly your time by not watching.
This movie is credited to horror genre whether its not really the horror here. Its triller at bet and drama at worst. The only horror was the guys who were supposed to be dead survived, if that what makes this movie horror, then excuse me for being old fashioned. The acting were terrifying. one minute the guy cry for his friend second one he looks like nothing ever happened. The story was an "ok". The beginning was way too long, as it was supposed to be introduction and prehistory, not half of film. The middle of film there is nothing happening, it was supposed to make characters realistic, yet it does not. The end was very predictable, there was only one unpredictable scene in car, which i probably slept over (yes, the movie was indeed boring). In beginning you see that there obviously are two different cameras, which you can differ by quality of video. Those, who wish not to read all that long story: this movie is NOT worth watching. I'm giving it a 5 out of ten, considering they had only 35k budget, that leaves it less than 500 bucks per actor counting the travel expenses of filming.
Good horror film Very good thriller even if it reminded me many other films and scripts that has circulated at the past like the "I know what you did last summer" and other films that bases their script in a story of revenge. Here it is about a couple of young teenagers who are killed from the girl's ex-boyfriend and his friends for jealousy purposes. Many years later the dead couple will get revenge for their death with a strange and torturing way for the people who involved in this tragedy. Usual but very nice script for a revenge story where the director succeed to create a scary atmosphere and force you to wait and see the next move