Just Follow Law (2007)

What makes it different from others?

Although it has its amusing moments, in eneral the plot does not convince.

The film was still a fun one that will make you laugh and have you leaving the theater feeling like you just stole something valuable and got away with it.

This is one of the best movies I’ve seen in a very long time. You have to go and see this on the big screen.

I saw this movie at a family gathering.Don't let the summary and title fool you. While this is a movie satiring the bureaucratic behaviors of the staff of a typical Singapore government agency, it goes all out to convince the audience that the problems lie with the staff, the ordinary Singaporeans and not the country's leaders. Instead the leader/minister in the movie is portrayed as a open minded visionary who supports and rewards new ideas. This is illogical considering that Singapore practices top down leadership to the extreme, so how can the leader be so different from the staff? Add in the indirect encouragement to Singapore's Prime Minister Lee to work harder for the next elections, one couldn't help but feel that Jack Neo tries harder to boot lick the country's leaders than to make a decent movie.And as usual, Jack Neo tries to disguise government propaganda as social commentary. The portrayals are too familiar and can be found in the daily nation building newspapers. Just 2 of the false portrayals I remember clearly.Old folks scavenging for empty drink cans are portrayed as financially independent people who just want to kill time (You will easily see how absurd this is if you are a foreigner).Blue collar workers are portrayed as lazy under-skilled workers who spend all their money on lottery and luxury items, and thus cannot even afford their children's medical fees. The truth is that one's potential is limited and wages for blue collar workers in Singapore is very low while the cost of living is high. Most blue collars workers in Singapore put in 50, 60 hours per week and still stay poor. Lottery is their only hope of making big.The subplot of the 2 main characters switching bodies is an old idea and the director adds in nothing new.To conclude, don't waste your money or time watching a movie that insults your intelligence, insults you and has no original funny moments.

Just Follow Law is a comedy/drama and focuses mainly on two of the characters, one upstairs - Tanya Chew (played by Fann Wong) and one downstairs - Lim Teng Zhui (played by Gurmit Singh aka PCK). Tanya Chew is a business scholar working for WAS and is the manager for the E&P Department whereas Ah Zhui is a technician working under her. Both the scenes that revolves around the main two characters would reveal much of the intention of what producer Jack Neo wants you to know and that is - for some things in life, it is not whether CAN OR NOT but whether you DARE. Tanya Chew is portrayed in this movie as a cold-blooded superior executive boss who loves ordering people around, having a lot of IQ but having nothing when it comes to EQ. Stepping on people's toes, being tactless and implying authoritarian behavior in front of her downstairs, she still do keep a certain good value (although mostly indirect being unable to display her affections), and that is being filial to her mother and having a deep heart for all her downstairs in not wanting them to fail and lose their jobs. But, such affections turned into commotions when it comes just right out from her mouth, making her being the person who least have PR skills. Have I also mentioned that she is hot-headed? Oh well, yeah, she is! =) As for Ah Zhui, being a technician he is, the first few scenes displayed his attitude as being carefree, a rule-bender (and he's really happy with it), a task-avoider and well it all sums up as being lazy. Ironically, he wants the best for his daughter, which can be seen in sending his daughter (only child) to tuitions and piano lessons. As can be seen, when asked to fix the neon lightings for the company, his first response was to 'call the contractor-lar'. Fann Wong was eager and smarty pants enough to retaliate - 'so I pay the contractor your salary?' and his reply was to avoid being the main person to 'kena arrow' by pointing to Bamboo - 'eh your joke lousy lar'... He leads a very simple life, wanting nothing more but eagerly anticipating for the payday to arrive and when it does, spend generously on food and basic necessities. They are not well-off, staying in small lots, but at least they are happy with their ongoing life, wishing for a better tomorrow.A freak accident happen after an argument between Tanya Chew and Ah Zhui when the main blame dawns upon Ah Zhui for using masking tapes to prevent one of the boards (enclosing a heap of mess in the parking lot) from falling after running out of nails. The boards fell (and so did the minister in the heap of mess) during a photography session with the China minister upon his visit to WAS. Ah Zhui's bonuses were withdrawn, but he needs the money to fulfill his promise to his daughter, and that is to buy her a piano for her lessons and practice. Due to this argument alone, and how Tanya looks down upon him, Ah Zhui with relentless effort got himself involved in a car-chase with Tanya and what happens then was an unexplainable tragic incident.They both exchanged souls while in the hospital and then like what they would explain and describe, Ah Zhui's body - I am Tanya Chew, Tanya is not Tanya, Ah Zhui is not Ah Zhui, Tanya is Ah Zhui, and Ah Zhui is Tanya, and I am Tanya Chew, can't you see that? Even I am confused! But speaking of which, with obvious fact, one is upgraded to a luxurious life with plenty of money and vacations to spare and spend while the other gets downgraded to a small simple life in which of obvious fact, a high achieving scholar like Tanya would probably not have experienced before. The consequences was a definite nonadjustable havoc, but watch as you will laugh coz that's where all the fun part is. Both learned about themselves when they are in another person's body and learn to help one another to again save their 'ca-cheng'. Tanya learns the most important lesson of all and that is even though the fact is clear cut about the hierarchy system in almost any companies or job description, you will never know when you will need the person's help and needed it most. Anyone can be your hero for the day or otherwise. As for Ah Zhui, well he learned about himself alright, not being able to pay for her daughter's medical fees, not being able to fulfill his daughter's desires and needs (buying a piano for her to practice, and having to borrow money for her daughter's tuition fees and piano lesson) and not being a good father to his daughter. He began to see all of these and appreciate what he once took for granted. His incapability in carrying out even the simplest of task made him aware of his status, not only towards his daughter, but to his friends and to himself.

Thou it's started like a comedy and social criticize of the famous Singaporean 'No U-turn', Jack Neo's movie turn, itself, quickly in a poor copy of Black Edwards' comedies when Fann Wong and Gurmit Singh exchange their souls to find themselves in each others body. Without this 'deja-vu' effect, Neo would have reach his moral easier and more originally.Neo's direction still looks like a newcomer film student who wants to play with the effects and have more the aspect of a TV film than a cinema feature. Even during a serious scene (Gurmit's daughter hit by a car), the cheap special effect starts laughs among audience instead of fear.This movie should have been be produce for TV with a cheaper budget, maybe this could have let a chance for others, and better, Singaporean filmmakers to produce a higher quality feature.But you know they let him do. It's just because, long time ago, Jack Neo made laughs...

It's not everyday that we see a movie so bad that we feel like walking out of the theater barely half an hour into the movie. This movie was one of those bad picks.Why is this so bad? First of all, it's a known fact that Jack Neo gets overtly preachy in his films (semblance of well-thought-out social commentaries). It got really annoying to hear him narrate in the background exactly the point that he was trying to portray in different scenes. It makes one wonder if his script writer is so inept at building these messages into the plot that the director has to summarize the messages for the audience.Secondly, the pacing of the movie was terrible. The movie spent too much time on the goofs after the main characters went through a body swap. The result was a really slow moving, hardly funny, occasionally distasteful half hour that made it hard to any thinking audience to stay watching.Thirdly, you know a movie is bad when it has to resort to creating jokes out of farting, urinating, and hurling swear words in a different dialect. In fact, there were so many expletives that I totally think it deserves an NC-16 rating for coarse language. You know it was a bad movie when the only thing you hear coming out of the theater was a young kid citing the swear words that were repeatedly used by one of the leads.I applaud Jack Neo's intention at highlighting social ills through comedies with mass appeal. But I think he has done it at the expense of art and craftsmanship. The result is a dull and unsophisticated TV drama that happens to be on the big screen.