Why Didn't They Ask Evans? (1980)

Very very predictable, including the post credit scene !!!

Masterful Movie

Awesome Movie

The first must-see film of the year.

This is what can happen when a film or TV adaptation of a book is so determined to remain slavishly faithful to the original source that it refuses to exercise any judgement on what to cut and what to leave in; no mystery film should run over 3 hours! "Why Didn't They Ask Evans?" stars with a gripping premise, but it becomes insufferably plodding. Frankie herself says at one point (at around the middle of the picture): "Well, why didn't they ask Evans? It would have saved us an awful lot of bother!", and I share her feelings. Francesca Annis is wonderful as Frankie, and the production is lovingly crafted, but the more liberal adaptation of the same Agatha Christie story for the "Marple" series in 2009 is a more exciting film. "The Seven Dials Mystery", another Christie adaptation made in 1981 with some of the same cast and crew, is also considerably better. *1/2 out of 4.

This BBC version of an Agatha Christie book shows the pitfalls of following a book too closely. Christie's books tend to move at a gentle, sometimes even sedate pace, and "Evans" is one that certainly does. It also has a solid school of red herrings to confuse the plot. This version is extremely faithful to the book, which results in a very slow, involved story. As a Christie fan, I gave it 7 stars, but it takes 3 hours to make its way through a relatively action-free story. I appreciate some of the tightening of plots that the BBC did for its later Christie productions much more.In the end, this movie is a leisurely pleasure, highlighted by the breathy waif Francesca Annis who brings considerable charisma to her role and plays off James Warwick very well.

The acting was a bit stilted in this one but, all in all, not a bad rendition of a Christie favorite (I'm a HUGE Christie fan). The filming comes off as sort of soap-opera-ie for the indoor shots but the outdoor scenes are A-O-K.I confess (as a Christie apologist) that this is one of Christie's more implausible mysteries but the director pulled it off darn good, without making his actors look ridiculous, (always a potential problem with Christie films). I was especially impressed with the length of this film, quite long, and a good partial afternoon of DVD or TV entertainment as far as I am concerned.To summarize, if you're an absolute Agatha Christie NUT, go ahead and consider this one an 8-star rating... however, if you are randomly looking around for ANY film to watch, regardless of genre, and have never seen a Christie mystery, you might find this to be a TWO.... (or a ONE!). I liked it a great deal and very much recommend it to appropriate fans.

Spoilers herein.I make a habit out of examining film adaptations of classic mystery novels for clues. I'm looking for clues about why the narrative works. There is a reason Christie is the best selling writer in history, even now as print runs are huge.I think I understand the primary mechanisms, how she engages the reader in a contest of wills. Usually, these don't translate well to film and we are given instead some puzzles with a surprise answer at the end.One approach is what was attempted here, just work through the book more or less as it is written. But that doesn't work either because the infrastructure of the imagination differs so between reading and viewing.Here the stretch of the mystery is too long for the reward. We'll know who the villain is soon enough just because of the theatrical mannerisms of the actors, and the rest comes across as `Hardy Boys' stuff. Add in some unbelievable coincidences (even for Christie), a Miss Moriarty Morphia and a little too pert Frankie and you'll see why this series wasn't continued.Ted's Evaluation -- 1 of 3: You can find something better to do with this part of your life.