x
Magic Beyond Words: The J.K. Rowling Story

Do you have Prime Video?

Start unlimited streaming now Click to start 30-day Free Trial
Home > Drama >

Magic Beyond Words: The J.K. Rowling Story

AD:This title is currently not available on Prime Video
Free Trial
View All Sources

Magic Beyond Words: The J.K. Rowling Story (2011)

July. 18,2011
|
6.6
|
PG-13
| Drama
AD:This title is currently not available on Prime Video
Free Trial
View All Sources

A look at J.K. Rowling from her humble beginnings as an imaginative young girl and awkward teenager, to the loss of her mother and the genesis of the Harry Potter book series.

...

Watch Trailer

Free Trial Channels

AD
Show More

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

Matialth
2011/07/18

Good concept, poorly executed.

More
Peereddi
2011/07/19

I was totally surprised at how great this film.You could feel your paranoia rise as the film went on and as you gradually learned the details of the real situation.

More
Kien Navarro
2011/07/20

Exactly the movie you think it is, but not the movie you want it to be.

More
Yash Wade
2011/07/21

Close shines in drama with strong language, adult themes.

More
Kim Westgarth
2011/07/22

This is an awful movie. Truly badly done. The accents are horrific and the scenery is stock shots. Getty images probably made a fortune off this one. The terminology is all wrong. The moment I saw the actual scenery I knew it was filmed in BC. You would think that Canadian actors could pull off a credible British accent. Poppy Montgomery shocks me as she is an Aussie. Surely she could at least fake a British accent. This was SUCH a disappointment. I'll bet J.K. Rowling cringed when this is brought up. No wonder its UNauthorized. Phew, what a stinker.

More
Deebee Daydreamer (deebeeinthesky)
2011/07/23

As I saw 'Magic Beyond Words' advertised as the story of J. K. Rowling's life before Hogwarts; I was disappointed to see the majority of the film depicting the publication and subsequent impact of 'Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone'. All of the film pre-Potter was hurried passed at a clumsy pace and trips over itself to get to the "riches" part of her story.Aside from that, most of the film was decent, very well acted - for the most part - and became very touching in places, about as much as you'd expect from an average made-for-TV biopic. I give it an overall 5/10 for full presentation.

More
kateruggles-114-54
2011/07/24

I can only concur with the comments made previously about the glaring misrepresentations of British life and culture in this film. I appreciate that biopics are an interpretation of a person's life, but while that person is still alive some efforts should at least be made to show their nation's culture with some semblance of authenticity. In the scene in secondary school Jo calls her teacher 'professor'. I am only 2 years younger than Jo Rowling and teachers were never called that, they were either 'sir' or 'miss' or called by their full surname with appropriate title, e.g. 'Dr/Mr/Mrs/Ms So-and-so'. The benefits office (benefits, not 'assistance') in the film was unfeasibly clean and tidy, I was a single mother at about the same time and dole (benefits) offices were always filthy, depressing places devoid of hope, and littered with cigarette butts and stinking of smoke, BO and despair. And the benefits officers never dressed like the Queen as the one in this film did. And your benefits book came in the post, it was not just miraculously handed over to you (although I appreciate that this would be done in the film for efficiency of time). But the biggest and most epic of fails was the line uttered by Jo's father when she failed to get into Oxford University and he said it was because she went to a public school. That would be STATE school. A public school in the UK is a fee-paying independent school, over 50% of students at Oxford and Cambridge universities attended public school, they are considered the privileged elite, not what Jo's dad was referring to which is the free public- funded schools paid for by taxation which something like 93% of British children attend. Aside from all that, it was a dreadful film. All the foreshadowing was really obvious and patronising. If you're going to make a film about a living person pay more attention to the cultural specificities. I'd gladly be a consultant in these matters. Kate the celluloid pedant xx

More
SnoopyStyle
2011/07/25

This is a Lifetime docudrama of JK Rowland's life leading up to the big success of Harry Potter. Is it factual? I can't say. Chances are they took liberties left, right and center. Although there is value to portray her life as a fable that inspired her to the world of Harry Potter. The big events are probably correct, but the little things like the cart on the train is probably added. That is not necessarily dishonest. It is quite expected.The story makes poetic sense. And Poppy Montgomery is quite fitting as Rowland. She's probably too pretty to play the part. But she gets the character in the right space. The production value is limited. They're shooting British Columbia for Britain. Obviously it's not the same. And you can definitely tell.

More