The Last Heist (2016)

Don't listen to the negative reviews

It's entirely possible that sending the audience out feeling lousy was intentional

Great example of an old-fashioned, pure-at-heart escapist event movie that doesn't pretend to be anything that it's not and has boat loads of fun being its own ludicrous self.

Amazing worth wacthing. So good. Biased but well made with many good points.

Please, don't watch this very very bad films with the same eyes - no trick word - you should have for a grade A picture. This is a grade Z film, with a cigarette pack budget. So please be indulgent. This is badly directed and acted. But I found this totally crazy story very exciting and unpredictable. That's precisely because of this I love this film. I far prefere this film to many other Hollywood big budget films. No heroes here, no good guys against evil dudes scheme. That's my own opinion.

This movie is far from the worst film I've ever seen. A lot of the other reviews are being a bit harsh in their assessments. If you have better things to do, then you should probably do those things. But If you have some time to kill there are worse ways to spend it. While I enjoyed it overall, I do wish that someone else would've made it. It's an interesting concept, and Rollins fit the bill, but most of the actors were pretty bad and the overall production was lacking. Keep the concept, keep Rollins and let a major studio produce it and I'd probably leave a 7 or 8 instead of a 5 star review.

In the main, cardboard characters collide with wooden acting. That said, Henry Rollins demonstrates that he can overcome the obstacle of ropey material and still deliver a decent performance. What a shame he don't recognise ropey material in the first instance. Dressed like an undertaker, he does a capable job of playing the creepy, serial killer. Giving the best performance of all he elevates himself above cliché. The story doesn't really hold together. In places, purpose-wise some of the characters' actions don't make any sense. They place themselves in harm's way to achieve no, apparently, useful goal. Both the good guys and the bad guys seem to be trying to trip themselves up in places. A good heist, in the movies at least, should be tight and methodical, think Heat (1995). They get in, get rich and get away. Most robbbers don't want to run into the police and get caught. Presumably. These guys take all day. There is no sense of impending deadline, so there's no tension. Conflict be shouldn't delivered in a way that makes characters unsympathetic. The robbers swear and gesticulate at one other too often to seem mature enough to be professional. Acting like juvenile delinquents makes them even more unsympathetic. This carry-on produces a sense of conflict but an irksome one. I could go on but it's too depressing. Overall, this lacks sympathetic characters and, because you cannot care about any of the characters, any real tension. It's slow, clumsy and clichéd. Television does it better.

This is an Ultra-Low-Budget Horror-Heist Hybrid from the Director of "Big Ass Spider" (2013), a Big-Bug-Comedy Hybrid. It's not as Good but manages to be Watchable if Wantable for more of, well, something.The Heist Angle is Lethargic, Slowly Paced, and Amateurish. The Horror-Serial Killer on the Loose Twist is Better but is slightly Underused. The Gore-Fest that is Unleashed behind the Cops and Robbers Plot gives it the Feel of the Different.It goes for the Juggler at times and Henry Rollins as "Windows" shows No Restraint in His Restrained "Polite" Insanely Religious Character and it makes for some Disturbing Quirks in a Movie that needs more of that in the Heist Scenes.Out in Front the Band of Robbers are a Dull Bunch as are the "Cops" who Show Up to Foil what is a Boring Story of Military Brothers, Drug Money, and assorted "Vigilante" Types. These Back Lot Movie Makers almost make it all Work, but not Quite.Worth a Watch for B-Movie Lovers, the DTV Curious, and Gore-Hounds. Others are Taking a Chance and will Require a High Tolerance that these Types Demand.