x
The Fearless Vampire Killers

Do you have Prime Video?

Start unlimited streaming now Click to start 30-day Free Trial
Home > Horror >

The Fearless Vampire Killers

AD:This title is currently not available on Prime Video
Free Trial
View All Sources

The Fearless Vampire Killers (1967)

November. 13,1967
|
7
|
NR
| Horror Comedy
AD:This title is currently not available on Prime Video
Free Trial
View All Sources

A noted professor and his dim-witted apprentice fall prey to their inquiring vampires, while on the trail of the ominous damsel in distress.

...

Watch Trailer

Free Trial Channels

AD
Show More

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

SnoReptilePlenty
1967/11/13

Memorable, crazy movie

More
Billie Morin
1967/11/14

This movie feels like it was made purely to piss off people who want good shows

More
Maleeha Vincent
1967/11/15

It's funny, it's tense, it features two great performances from two actors and the director expertly creates a web of odd tension where you actually don't know what is happening for the majority of the run time.

More
Bob
1967/11/16

This is one of the best movies I’ve seen in a very long time. You have to go and see this on the big screen.

More
MonsterVision99
1967/11/17

Dance of the Vampires (1967) its often considered to be one of Polanski's worst films, mainly because many people find it to be dull, boring, unfunny and underdeveloped. However, I find it quite riveting. It inspired many horror comedies and I think I can see how many 70's and 80's filmmakers have drawn inspiration from this film, specially Joe Dante and John Landis.Its not incredibly hilarious but I think its funny, not enough to make me laugh out loud but its still serviceable. What I like the most about the movie is of course the usual stuff you get with Polanki's films, the direction, the performances, the music and the scenery. Its what you would expect from the great Polanski.I never really appreciated this film until now, its slow but I like that, it takes its time to establish the mood, the characters, the atmosphere and the overall tone the film will have.It may be a new favorite of mine, I will have to see if I will enjoy this as much in another viewing in the future.

More
enoughtoil
1967/11/18

Polanski made several good movies; this is NOT on of them. Indeed, this must be one of the stupidest movies ever made by anyone. It is not even remotely funny or frightening. The two leading characters are stumblebums who meander witlessly through a ridiculous plot. The beautiful women who adorn the screen are merely decorations: they have little to do but be the objects of the hopeless voyeurism of these two buffoons. In a scene straight out of a Donald Trump playbook, one of the bumbling idiots, who is played by Polanski, tries without her consent to touch the breasts of one of the damsels and she quickly smacks his hands away. Speaking of the Donald, who is more frightening than anything this movie has to offer, the character who is the vampire son of the principal vampire has a hairdo that is the spitting image of the one currently sported by Mr. Trump. Perhaps it will be a different stake, the kind he loves to eat, that will prove to be the undoing of today's "fearless vampire killer."

More
calvinnme
1967/11/19

... but here he isn't quite there yet.This vampire spoof never really gets off the ground, despite director Roman Polanski's best efforts. Cute opening credits get the viewer's hopes up for a farce. But the film is a mix of subtle spoof and occasional scares, and they just don't mix well. The film inspires the occasional smile or laugh. I liked the cinematography, the sets, and of course Sharon, but I thought there could have been a lot more jokes written into it. There seemed to be a lack of dialogue overall. The film finally gets moving in the last 40 minutes, and a few scenes attain slapstick comedy heights; most notably the scene in which Ian Quarrier's vampire makes a pass at Roman Polanski's vampire hunter. If the whole film was this funny, it would have been an undisputed classic. Instead, it is just a mild disappointment.It's recently been on Turner Classic Movies, but until that time I remember seeing it last in the summer of 1976, on TV in the middle of the night, during the summer between finishing high school and starting college. My younger sister and I stayed up to watch it, and I remembered being somewhat bored with it at the time, and after giving it a chance recently, I was still somewhat bored. Back in 1976, I asked my sister, why did we both stay up to watch this? We both had to admit that it was because Sharon Tate was in it, neither of us had ever seen anything she had been in, and ultimately our curiosity was born from the famous Manson murder cases and how she died. I just remember sitting there at age 18, looking at that beautiful young lady and her husband to be, Mr. Polanski, who was to suffer the most tragic of losses, and thinking "someday you'll both be famous, but you don't want to know why".

More
Guy DeMatties
1967/11/20

Roman Polanski directs and stars in this spoof of old-time vampire movies as he plays the assistant of a bat researcher (Jack McGowran) who is intent on discovering vampires in Transylvania. Polanski's character tries to protect the young daughter (Sharon Tate) of an innkeeper from the advances of the local vampire who has been terrorizing the countryside. Ironically, this is the film where Polanski met Tate, who was soon to become his wife, which indirectly led to her being a murder victim herself in the Charles Manson murders. The vampire hunters hunt down the vampire to confront him and save the townspeople, whose number of vampire casual;ties have risen dramatically over the last year. A lot of humorous moments, while also adding some real tension.

More