Home > Drama >

Pet Sematary

Watch on
View All Sources

Pet Sematary (1989)

April. 21,1989
|
6.5
|
R
| Drama Horror
Watch on
View All Sources

After the Creed family's cat is accidentally killed, a friendly neighbor advises its burial in a mysterious nearby cemetery.

...

Watch Trailer

Free Trial Channels

AD
Show More

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

Hellen
1989/04/21

I like the storyline of this show,it attract me so much

More
Interesteg
1989/04/22

What makes it different from others?

More
Manthast
1989/04/23

Absolutely amazing

More
Derry Herrera
1989/04/24

Not sure how, but this is easily one of the best movies all summer. Multiple levels of funny, never takes itself seriously, super colorful, and creative.

More
one-nine-eighty
1989/04/25

Based on a Stephen King book, "Pet Semetry" is a horror film that looks at death, desire, reanimation, and why you should never build on top of an ancient Indian burial ground. A young 2.4 family move into the country, the new house they move into is right next to a big and dangerous road. They learn from their new neighbour that the road is deadly and has killed lots of local resident's pets over the years, and as such there is a local cemetery that was built by kids for their pets. While the family, minus the father, are away for a holiday tragedy strikes and the family cat is killed. The young father takes the cat to "Pet Semetry" and buries him, little does he know about the magic and witchcraft sown deep into this ancient Indian burial ground. The cat is reanimated, but is not like his former self, instead of being a loving cat; he's now feral and vicious. These are only the beginning of the problems though. Film's made out of Stephen King book's don't/didn't always make the grade on the silver screen, a lot of them never captured the tension of his writing and the movie adaptions ended up a little cheesy. This film however managed to do well, and doesn't detract massively from the book. I remember watching it as a youngster in the 90's and it was quite frightening. Watching it back closer to the age of 40 yo I can say that he film still manages to hold its own. The reason for this is because it's a solid story. Rather than get too deep into scientific reasons for events, or the history of the location, or even what form evil is taking in the film - it's handled from the point of view of the young father - we don't learn any more than he does, we just have to go with it. Nowadays there would likely be an entire additional hour looking at why reanimation affects different people differently, and why the evil is there in the first place. Granted, the book does delve into some of these things a little to build the tension, but in the film, there just isn't enough time to do so while maintaining the pace of events. So handling it the way it was generally works. The casting and acting is good, the young father is played by Dale Midkiff and is generally believable throughout. Denise Crosby plays he wife and does well, although I've never really been a fan for some reason (she has limited expressions and emotions - sorry). Fred Gwynne is the narrator and neighbour and drives the film forward, his performance is really good actually - sometimes hard on the ears to understand due to the random accent, but he's a rock in this film. The real winner is Miko Hughes as Gage Creed, the youngest child. He seems to be play sweet and creepy real well - I can see why he went on to have a decent career beyond this. Fair enough his lines are a little staged early on, but the switch in persona he manages later makes up for the cheesiness of the opening performance he brings. All in all this is a decent film, I can see why it's been rated highly amongst reviewers and I concur with them for the most part. For me this gets a 7 out of 10 - It's an all-around decent horror film, with a mix of emotions on display, despite being nearly 30 years old it manages to not look dated and out of place.

More
msudude22
1989/04/26

I enjoy this movie, it is one of the better Stephen King movies. I watched it again tonight. The only thing that is unbelievable is when Louis digs Gage's body up. It is in one piece. I would think if someone that small got hit by a semi going at a high rate of speed, the body would be in several pieces. But despite that, it is a good movie.

More
xXMetalrockeRXx
1989/04/27

One thing i admire in this movie is the themes it attempts to explore, and even though i find those themes very intense and terrifying, this film just doesn't translate it in the correct way. Yes, its a film that does try to be good. You can tell that everyone involved with it did what they could to make a good movie. Unfortunately the result was way less than awe-inspiring.While i don't consider this to be a "bad film", it is very lacking. The direction is... okay. What disappointed me the most was its complete lack of suspense. The editing is sometimes very choppy and that doesn't help either when you are trying to build up tension. The other thing is the writing. Now, I am a Stephen King fan, but every time i see that he wrote a screenplay... i get sacred. Because both times I've gotten very excited about that, I've been let down. King does try to stay faithful to his novel by almost never straying from the original story-line, which i appreciated, but some of it just doesn't translate to film that well.In the end, this is a perfectly enjoyable one-time watch. And also i can understand if you love this movie, because it has very good guilty pleasure potential, but in my humble opinion, the film is sadly unremarkable. 5.5/10

More
Brett Banser
1989/04/28

I normally don't take the time to review movies I dislike, but in this case I feel like I need to vent. This movie tries so hard to be a genuinely creepy movie and through out the movie, it delivers on that, yet I still feel let down by the end product. The first problem i have is the sound editing in the movie is really quite agitating, and I realize that is probably by design, but I have seen many amazing horror movies that do not rely on audio this jarring to put the viewer in a state of unrest. I mean I cringe every time I hear a phone ring or an alarm go off, a truck horn blare. Like I said, I see the intent of it, but the execution is flawed. The second problem is the overall tone of the movie which is inconsistent throughout. When Judd and Louis make the trip to the burial ground the first time, that is the tone I want to be present throughout the movie. Instead we get little sections that make it feel like the exorcist or chucky or poltergeist, it just bounces around too much. And I appreciate the music of the Rmaones, but their songs in the movie, again, do nothing for the tone and are actually so removed from the movie that when Pet Sematary began playing at the end of the film it felt completely removed from the rest of the film.

More

Watch Now Online

Prime VideoWatch Now