Braveheart (1995)

To me, this movie is perfection.

SERIOUSLY. This is what the crap Hollywood still puts out?

Good start, but then it gets ruined

A lot of fun.

If you think, this is a great movie and historically correct, you really should look up what critics write about this movie. It didn't end up for no reason at 2nd place in a rating of 'The Times' of most historically wrong movies ever made.And this is quiet sad since the story has a lot of potential. If you make a historic movie about such an important topic and mix up facts with sorry not sorry made up bullsh#t, I cannot take the movie seriously anymore at all.

An incredible motion picture, Braveheart is a sensational masterpiece and one of the greatest movies ever put to screen. It is a feast of color, motion, sound and emotion which delivers one of the greatest cinematic experiences one could ever hope to get.The first hour of the film is pretty much the ultimate cinematic experience. We witness brutality, tragedy, love, redemption, revenge and much more in the course over just the first hour. The rest of the movie is equally great, but i would pick the first hour as the ultimate cinematic experience. The small romantic part of the story between Wallace and his secret bride is quite short yet so convincing due to James Horner's incredible emotionally rich musical score or the little things such as him returning the flower she gave him as a child or the genuine and natural looks they give eachother without speaking that it makes it all the more emotional and powerful when his wife does eventually meet a terrible fate.The acting is of top notch quality. Particularly Patrick McGoohan is extremely convincing as the ruthless King Edward Longshanks and Angus Macfadyen as Robert the Bruce caught between his own conscience while trying to pick the right side and make the right decisions. Gibson, Gleeson & O'Hara are also extremely convincing as the three leading men of the scottish army.Yet what really makes Braveheart the movie into what it is is Gibson's character Wallace and his ideology for a free Scotland and his incapability of stopping until it is achieved. This is combined with excellent dialogue such as the speech before the battle of Stirling which makes his character the ultimate well developed idealist instead of a generic hero type. It is a powerful statement about freedom and what we are prepared to do in order to achieve it. Some critics critize the lack of historical accuracy in Braveheart, which is mostly correct. However, these critics do not realize that film is a cinematic experience, and should not be judged by factors that have little to do with the actual cinematic experience. What Mel Gibson created here is an epic emotional journey that lives and breathes due to romanticizing history into fiction which only strengthened the movie itself. Battle sequences are incredibly filmed. The cinematography is already great in Braveheart with many extraordinary sweeping landscape shots of the green planes of Scotland but in the battle of Stirling this reaches its quality climax. The widescreen shots of the entire English army with the trees in the background are just breath taking visual beauty that is a delight to the eyes. You can tell Gibson took inspiration from Akira Kurosawa's style ( creating epic widescreen shots with constant movement ) and in this particular scene especially Ran (1985) seems to have been a major influence. The battle sequences are always shot in a way that you can understand what is going on and how the battle is playing out, and the violence is realistic and brutal, as is the movie. Also admirable is Gibson's incredible use of slow motion or long drawn out rides of horses or men to build up tension to a point where we are sitting on the edge of our seat. It is a movie full of extremely well build tension, which is lacking in most films today.With great dialogue, acting, cinematography, incredible music, tension, emotional value & many beautiful shots what Mel Gibson has achieved here is an absolute masterpiece of the historical epic genre.

Winner of 5 Academy Awards, including Best Picture & Best Director, Braveheart is an astounding piece of epic filmmaking that's powered by outstanding work from Mel Gibson, both in front & behind the camera, and features some of the greatest battle sequences ever filmed in cinema history.Set in late 13th century, Braveheart tells the story of William Wallace, a Scottish rebel who leads an uprising against the English kingdom after his childhood love is publicly executed by them. As his legend spreads, more clans join his quest to free Scotland once n for all and vow to fight by his side.Directed by Mel Gibson in what's only his sophomore directorial effort, the film presents him in complete control of his craft and is an impressive exhibition of his cinematic eye for spectacle. Finding the right balance between its action & drama, Gibson directs the entire film with the assured confidence of an auteur.The script takes extreme liberties with the historical events, including a love angle that's unnecessarily crammed into the narrative. However, despite the numerous inaccuracies, it remains a largely captivating experience. Gibson is patient in his approach here but lets loose during the battle scenes that are impeccable staged & shot.The medieval set pieces come alive in meticulous detail and are quite reminiscent of the era its tale is set in. Cinematography is spot-on, applying right techniques at the right time to amplify a given scene's effectiveness. Its 178 minutes runtime is rarely felt, thanks to its fine editing & steady pace. And James Horner knocks it out of the park with a profoundly intimate score.Coming to the acting department, Braveheart is Mel Gibson's show in this aspect as well. Leading from the front as the Scottish warrior, Gibson makes the most of his imposing screen presence to deliver an emotionally resonant performance that only gets better as plot progresses and he's brilliantly supported by the rest of the cast who all chip in with strong inputs of their own.On an overall scale, Braveheart may not be the most historically accurate biopic but there are a lot many things that it does right to cement its spot amongst the best examples of epic storytelling. Crafted with precision, told with composure & leaving the audience breathless with its expertly staged & brutally violent battles, Braveheart is one epic extravaganza that delivers the goods in memorable doses.

I watched "Braveheart" on cable last night and I wondered why I bothered.The movie was slow, plodding, and bloated. The pacing was such that one could stop watching for a few minutes while one went and made supper, return, and not really miss anything.The only character who was the least bit interesting was Edward Longshanks, played by Patrick McGoohan. Then again, Mr. McGoohan has often played such people (e. g., Number 6 in his TV series "The Prisoner"). I could well imagine Edward being tough, brooking no debate or challenge to his rule.Everyone else was largely colourless and the portrayal of William Wallace didn't particularly convince me that he was the leader of a rebellion. The romantic angle between Wallace and Princess Isabelle was laughable at best. I mean, really--a royal consorting with a serf?Other reviewers have pointed out historical inaccuracies in the movie. That's nothing new--for example, take a look at Errol Flynn's portrayal of George Custer in "They Died With Their Boots On".So why did this movie win the Best Picture Oscar and not "Apollo 13"? I admit that I'm biased because not only am I a space buff but I was in high school when the events for which that mission is remembered occurred. The latter, however, had action and suspense and, on the whole, was tightly-paced. Even the historical inaccuracies are relatively minor. "Braveheart", on the other hand, was ponderously dull and, for me, a complete waste of time.Maybe there were political reasons for it. It certainly couldn't have been on the artistic merits of the movie.It's the second time I saw the movie. The first time was nearly 20 years ago. I didn't like it then and I didn't like it now.