Dead Man Walking (1988)

I like the storyline of this show,it attract me so much

Such a frustrating disappointment

All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.

This movie feels like it was made purely to piss off people who want good shows

Did any of you, "who watched the movie", actually see any of the stunts performed?? If so, what did you think? I watched the movie, and I'm no motion picture stuntman, but I thought the action was awesome! If anyone out there has actually scene the movie, and didn't help make the movie, please give an honest reply about the stunts. I have not scene a B-movie with action such as stair-falls, fire-burns, and fight scenes to the caliber of Hollywood in ANY B-rated movie EVER! Please respond with your personal opinion. Whether you like the movie or not, let's hear what you think about the stunts in this film. From a novice's point of view, tell me, (the B-Rated movie fan), what people think.

I feel bad for the special effects artist on this one, as they are the only person who should feel like they accomplished anything. The acting may or may not be terrible, its hard to tell when the dialogue is that atrocious. I don't mean c level horror movie bad where its fun, I mean just awful. The plot makes absolutely no sense, and the killer is resurrected with a plot device lifted directly from the killer snowman: Jack Frost of all things. The main plot device involving the eyes is hokey through the film, then all of a sudden absolutely ridiculous with the final fleeting moments. The sex scene is among the silliest I have ever witnessed, I have seen better rationale for sex in porn flicks. Heres two people outside! Now they're banging! Nowthe killer is there! Watching! Wow! The cg effects however are considerably better than found in most direct to video films, and are the ONLY thing this movie has going for it.

I Have to say i have seen some pretty bad movies in my time and i actually quite like bad horror movies. I'm a huge fan of B Movies and independent film unfortunately you occasionally get your fingers burned like i did with Mr Hell.One thing i'm happy about is i never paid to see this movie if i had i would have demanded my money back directly from the film makers. there's just no excuse for a movie this bad.It looks terrible, the acting is awful, the diolouge is some of the worst i have ever seen in a low budget film and thats saying something.worst of all it wasn't scary at all the FX where terrible and its attempts at humour where utterly horrible.I wish i could give this movie less than a rating of 1 but unfortunately i cant however if i can say anything positive the gore is plentifull avoid this movie, regardless of your taste in film i guarantee you wont like this its impossible to find anything at all good to say about it.it gets a 0.5 rating in my book and the 0.5 is there purely for the gore.Awful, Awful, Awful...

Acting in this movie is amateur (makes one wonder what motivated the choice of genre), representing typical, nonetheless exasperating, mix of inadequate feelings (consequently, behavior) and involuntary pauses between lines being filled with either blank or bewildered facial expressions.Arguably, the plot isn't much worse than that of the "exclusive horror" movie majority, meaning it's plain, predictable and thus, boring (when not silly).Dialogues complete "Mr. Hell" as a cinematographic disaster, being fragmentary, extremely uninformative and unnatural. Moreover, sadly, the writers chose to uphold the flawed tradition of covering up the lack of scariness with would-be humor, would-be irony and would-be sarcasm, manifested in shabby, overly repetitive "cliché - change of context - touché" form.The only thing that counts positive is solid B-class photography.