Border Badmen (1945)

How sad is this?

Highly Overrated But Still Good

Bad Acting and worse Bad Screenplay

The movie's not perfect, but it sticks the landing of its message. It was engaging - thrilling at times - and I personally thought it was a great time.

BORDER BADMEN is a very cheap black and white western with a starring role for former FLASH GORDON Buster Crabbe. He plays one of a cowboy duo who help out a female landowner from the crooks trying to steal her estate. This one clocks in at under an hour in length and has the usual plot ingredients, with a lot of horse riding and a handful of fight scenes. The broad-chested Crabbe makes for a charismatic hero but there's simply not as much to get excited or amused about here as in his science fiction pictures.

Buster Crabbe, a fine actor and athlete, never got his due in Hollywood. He played a second hand Tarzan in the beginning and ended his career churning out B movies for cheapie studios such as PRC. One of his last hurrahs was playing "Captain Gallant of the Foreign Legion" on early television. He is, of course, best remembered today for the Flash Gordon serials of the 1930's. When he claimed that he was never really given a chance in Hollywood, he was speaking the truth and not just rolling in self-pity. His B westerns such as "Border Badmen" are fairly good oaters despite the low-budget. He was teamed with a master comedian, Fuzzy St. John, who had learned his trade from his uncle, the legendary Fatty Arbuckle. He was adept at physical humor such as taking pratfalls. He has some funny scenes in "Border Badmen," especially when he is sitting up with a dead body and when he and Billy Carson (Buster Crabbe) are exploring a hidden passage way. Buster and Fuzzy carry on in a manner that reminds the viewer of an old Abbott and Costello routine. "Fuzzy, try to find an opening," commands Buster. "If I can't find one, I'll build one," Fuzzy replies. The first movie I remember seeing when I was about four years old was a Buster Crabbe/Fuzzy St. John western at a Saturday matinée in my hometown. The only thing I remember from the film was Fuzzy St. John having a devil of a time in a haystack. So I know his humor was extremely appealing to youngsters of the 1940's.The plot is one that was recycled in several B westerns about a gang of bad guys trying to keep the female heir to a large estate from claiming what was rightfully hers. This time around, the gang plans not only to kidnap the lady as she comes to town but to replace her with a substitute who will get the land and money for them. Lovely Lorraine Miller plays the heir Helen Stockton. There is no romantic tie between Stockton and Carson as one would expect. Possibly the producers being on a shoestring budget didn't have the time or money to promote this angle and make it believable for the intended audience which would consist mainly of kids and their parents. Marilyn Gladstone plays the part of the stand-in heir. She looks like a saloon gal even though she is weak in the acting department. Buster and Fuzzy get involved because Fuzzy is a cousin "six times removed" to the deceased whose will is being probated. As it turns out Fuzzy is cousin number thirty two. There is plenty of action once the film gets started. At one point Billy Carson says, "It's time for some action." After that remark the action never lets up. The gallery of villains is a noteworthy one consisting of such stalwarts as Charles King. The viewer will recognize the faces if not the names. The title "Border Badmen" is a generic one. There are plenty of badmen in the film but nothing is said about a border as I remember. Still, if you are a fan of the old Saturday matinée cowboy movies, you should enjoy this one.

Border Badmen had the potential to be an pretty decent "B" western. Multiple heirs, secret chambers, and impersonations make the plot a step above the usual. Unfortunately, Fuzzy St. John single handedly brings this down to the level of the ridiculous. I don't have overly high expectations for a "B" western but his antics just made this movie painful to watch. I compare any movie against all others I've seen, not just against their budget equals. That puts this movie up against movies like N by NW, Schindler's List, The Day the Earth Stood Still, etc. With a Gabby Hayes and without St. John's "humor", this might have made it to a 3. As it is, this was pretty excruciating and among the biggest dogs I've watched. 1/10.

This isn't bad for a 40's B-western. One thing I liked was that the villains weren't as cliched as most are in this genre, and the plot (inheritance fraud) was a nice change of pace from the usual revenge/robberies formulas. The comic relief was actually pretty good too, unlike most of its contemporaries (i.e., annoying).For me though, two things let the film down. First, occasionally the script has some really dumb lines (e.g., "I wonder what they want with the identification papers"). Second, the villains give up way too easily after all the trouble they've gone through. Were it not for these shortcomings of the script, this would have been a good film; as it stands, it is only above average.6/10