Brotherhood of the Rose (1989)

Excellent, Without a doubt!!

I really wanted to like this movie. I feel terribly cynical trashing it, and that's why I'm giving it a middling 5. Actually, I'm giving it a 5 because there were some superb performances.

This is one of the few movies I've ever seen where the whole audience broke into spontaneous, loud applause a third of the way in.

The first must-see film of the year.

For those of you who are conspiracy theorists you will look far and not succeed to find a film that will buttress your belief that the whole world and its populace is manipulated by a very few people. In a short prelude to the main film, the top intelligence agents from the world's great powers before World War II gather and make a pact to create a sanctuary for the intelligence community. A network of safe houses some of them quite swanky resorts named Abelard. The objective is that they are opened to any one working in that field and that no one will be a target within those limits. With that degree of safety the ones with the information and the knowledge can manage those temporary governments that democracies elect.Robert Mitchum plays the current American master of Abelard, he's also the Deputy Director of our CIA who's been around for decades. He has the power of a J. Edgar Hoover without Hoover's penchant for public relations. Mitchum prefers no publicity for himself or his activities, he operates in the shadows.One of the things he's done is hang around the orphanages looking for bright and misfit youths with no families. He finds two such in kids who grow up to be Peter Strauss and David Morse. He home schools them and takes them into the agency where they become the best trained killers they can be. They think of him as a father figure. Of course he's trained other pairs which they find out about, but that's one of many secrets he keeps from them and the world.For reasons of politics and 'national security' his 'sons' have to be sacrificed. But Mitchum has trained Strauss and Morse too well. So for the length of this TV miniseries it's their training against all the resources at Mitchum's command.It's a strange world that Mitchum has created for his boys. No feminine influences of any kind. Women have their place, but simply as sexual release because men are cursed with those kind of needs. A person like Mossad agent Connie Sellecca doesn't factor in. A mistake that helps bring him down in the end beside his own hubris.Brotherhood Of The Rose is an intriguing espionage tale with Robert Mitchum in a dominating performance. Strauss, Sellecca, and Morse have their moments, but this is a Robert Mitchum show.

Let's open this with a quote: "It was true to the novel and turned out very well, I think. I keep looking for it on cable TV, but it never seems to show up. I came across a commercial videotape of it and was alarmed to find that it was cut to 90 minutes and barely recognisable in terms of my book".David Morrell Author of The Brotherhood Of The Rose. That alone is sufficient for me to recommend this film - The author of the book himself is a fan. As Morrell's comment makes obvious - Get the full-length version. It just so happens, I ordered the new full-length DVD from Sweden. Plays fine on Region 2 players, but reportedly works on other regions too...As for the film - It's not really a Spy flick... More a thriller, but somewhat different. The organisations and professions themselves are not so important. What matters most is the relationship between the two 'brothers' and their 'father'. I suppose it's a family tale, set in the genre of a political/spy thriller. Some very good factual background and brilliant actors combine to make this an enjoyable watch. The secondary support cast are not particularly animated, but then they are often just passing faces who serve one purpose - Usually getting killed. What really makes this is Robert Mitchum and his interaction between Peter Strauss and David Morse. The two latter actors in scenes alone have a very brotherly way about them and you get the impression these two actors were close friends on and off set. Even when they're not in the same scene, all three have a sense of family about them. James B. Sikking and Connie Sellecca are engaging in their own right, as well as great vehicles for the main 3 to play off. The film itself does feel like a 70s/80s thriller flick, but that is in perfect keeping with the period the novel is set in, so it works well for the story. In terms of plot, it's an engaging one that doesn't always go where you think it will and ends, like all good thrillers, with a fantastic and surprising twist!!

The original airing of this movie (on TV) was outstanding! However, when it was put into VHS, it was chopped up pretty bad and now there is quite a lot of good footage missing. Now (in VHS format) the movie looks choppy, it jumps around too quickly, and vital story components are now gone. I look forward to the day when it is released in DVD and restored to its original length. The story, in short... Two orphaned boys are adopted by a major American Intelligence officer, and the two boys are trained to be top assassins for the U.S. But when each of the orphans (now agents) run into unexpected dangers, the only person they can turn to (other than each other) is their adopted father. Or can they?

This was a great book and turned into a surprisingly good movie, even for television. It was written by David Morrell, who also wrote First Blood, in case you didn't know. Robert Mitchum, David Morse, Connie Sellecca and a host of others made this quite an ensemble cast for a television production. If you can find the movie, watch it. If you can find the book, read it. After all, you have what else to do?