Video Violence (1987)

What makes it different from others?

Such a frustrating disappointment

Sadly Over-hyped

The film's masterful storytelling did its job. The message was clear. No need to overdo.

this movie is one of the worst low budget films ever spawn from the void. I going to review by going into 3 categories, plot, effects, and finally sound, Plot= let me tell you something, if your plot is worse then Mano's the hands of fate then one you have no skills at all or two you need help. their is no plot to really discuss because its so badly writing that a semi-brain dead hamster would do better then this crap.Effects= the effects in this movie are dreadful, the blood is funny looking like a grade school kid whipped it up, the gory is distasteful,not that I don't like cheap gory its just this is worst then a high school version of hamlet, its really laughable.Sound= not much for sound really, but the score is nonexistent, literary! so if you see this spawn of Satan on a video store rack, please do as all a good deed and burn it with a flamethrower!

"Video Violence" is a decent entry if not entirely flawless.**SPOILERS**In a small southern town, Steven Emory, (Art Neil) welcomes Rick Carlson, (Kevin Haver) into his small video rental store, servicing the entire town. While going through the return tapes one morning, they find a tape that contains a man being slaughtered for real. Convinced it's a snuff tape rather than an actual movie, he goes out to try to find out more about it but only ends up getting nowhere in town. As the days go by and he starts to unravel more about the mysterious tapes that keep appearing in his store showing innocent people being slaughtered, the more he and his wife Rachel, (Jackie Neil) start to think something is wrong. Finally confronted with the notion that the townspeople create their own home-made snuff films for the town's enjoyment, they try to get out before they become the next victims.The Good News: This one here isn't that bad, and is actually watchable at times. The best part is the really impressive plot to the film. This is one of the most original ideas ever, as this is something that could very easily be real and happening, which is a terrifying idea but very real. As well, the play-out of the idea is ingenious, quickly introduced to set it up later with the very idea that it just builds and builds into a rather creepy tale that works due to how it came to light. That is one of the few things it gets right, as well as the gore. This one has a lot of bloodshed in it, and there's plenty of it here. From stabbings and impalings to being sliced open to lots of limbs being hacked off, there's a lot of it in here. Most of that has to do with the plot, while the rest of it comes from it's rather bloody videos. There's one in here that really stands out, though, which is the second killing scene shown on tape. It's shown from the killer's perspective, shows the glee and joy they take in doing what they're doing and it's all captured close-up and realistic, like a real snuff film that the others purport to be. There's a real brutality to it that is incredibly appealing, with it's down-and-dirty feeling that comes through like aces. That it also includes the rather clever idea of writing letters into a victim with a razor, that is over the chest and is a brutal scene to take in. There's a really great feel to it from that which gives it a great watchability to it from these elements, and from there it really gives the film some positive marks..The Bad News: This one doesn't have a whole lot of flaws, but what's there is pretty noteworthy. The film's low-budget quality here is it's biggest failing, as there's hardly anything hiding it. The fact that it's general look, feel and tone scream that are painfully obvious, and it really hurts the overall tone and feel of the film. That also extends to the fact that it really shows when it comes to how the film looks over everything. From the really simplistic way that the film closes everything in and never really looks big or grand wherever it is, from the video-store to the house to the small-town when outdoors, there's always the sense that it's closed-off and small. That really works against it, since there's the fact that there's plenty of similar films that have a much bigger feel to it than what they really have, while this one has a closed one is where it really fails against the others. There's also the scene that really gives away the twist at the end, where when grabbing the hostage and getting away, not once do the kidnappers physically touch the victim but that person actually takes time to make sure that they get into the car without injuring themselves, something which wouldn't have happened in the real world. Whether that's intentional or not, it really ruins the film's big twist, which can be seen coming from a mile away as well. These here are what really conspire against the film.The Final Verdict: For a shot-on-video film, this one isn't that bad, but there is some flaws to it that will hold it down, even against the others out there. Give it a shot if in the mood for this style of film or are a fan of these kinds of films, while those who are fanatical about bigger feeling films should advise caution.Rated R: Graphic Violence, Graphic Language and Nudity

Steven Emory has just moved with his wife from New York to open a small video rental store on in the middle of nowhere. One day his only employee discovers a unlabeled tape in a returned video case. Curiosity gets the better of them, so while the store's empty they choose to pop it in and watch. It's a horrid snuff film so Steven runs to the police station and tries to talk the chief into checking it out. Upon his return to the store, cop in tow, he finds that the video has been switched & his employee missing. How far will he go to find out what really happened? What this extremely low-budget shot on video movie lacks in anything that usually constitutes a 'good' film (acting, production values of any kind, etcetera), it more than makes up for in story and heart. It's funny and for the most part enjoyable. For optimum viewing pleasure enjoy with some alcoholic beverage of your choice and a few like-minded friends. If you liked "pieces" or "2000 Maniacs", you'll more then likely enjoy this too.My Grade: B- DVD Extras: Audio commentary by Director/ writer Gary Cohen, Special effects men Mark Dolsom & Mark Kwiatek, and actors Art Neill, Paul Kay, David Christopher, & Uke; 15 minute interview with Cohen; and Trailers for Video Violence 1, Video Violence 2, Cannibal Campout, Woodchipper Massacre, & Ghoul School (the DVD also comes with the sequel to this film on the same disc)

One of the 30 movies i saw that are a truly horror mastepiece. this movie -at least- in Argentina is very difficult to see or rent. It was film in video and i think when the whole "video" mania was just starting. This is an excellent example of making a great film with very little money. I think it is an example for every filmaker.