Home > Action >

Batman

AD:This title is currently not available on Prime Video
Free Trial
View All Sources

Batman (1966)

July. 30,1966
|
6.5
|
PG
| Action Comedy Crime
AD:This title is currently not available on Prime Video
Free Trial
View All Sources

The Dynamic Duo faces four super-villains who plan to hold the world for ransom with the help of a secret invention that instantly dehydrates people.

...

Watch Trailer

Free Trial Channels

AD
Show More

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

BlazeLime
1966/07/30

Strong and Moving!

More
Acensbart
1966/07/31

Excellent but underrated film

More
Micransix
1966/08/01

Crappy film

More
Cristal
1966/08/02

The movie really just wants to entertain people.

More
zakkyliar
1966/08/03

DC nowadays believes in the idea of "Dark" and "Edgy" cinematic medium, and we can see their low success clearly. In my opinion it shouldn't have gone beyond Tim Burton's unique dark vision. In contrast to all that, what we have here is a very enjoyable almost a "childish" movie. That doesn't mean it's aimed towards small kids though, any lover of campy fun can enjoy through this not so serious idea of Batman. I must admit, I never watch superhero movies, especially the latest installments of Batman always repulsed me in some way, but I can firmly stand behind this idea of colorful, funny Batman. 7/10, Enjoyed! Just don't expect any serious dramatic lines or dark visuals and you are good too go.

More
sarahroberts-91001
1966/08/04

This was an alright film as it makes you feel good about yourself and it makes you happy although it seemed a bit silly at some points.

More
aaronjamesmaximus
1966/08/05

This movie starts out with Batman using his shark repellent a stupid trope that has stuck with batman to this day. He's also trying to get rid of a giant cliché looking bomb it takes him what seems like an hour. And this movie just tries desperately to make the audience laugh but it comes off as stupid and unfunny.Anyone who likes Batman as a campy idiot is not a real batman fan just and twit who has never read a comic or watched Batman the Animated Series. Adam West sucked he was a bad actor and ruined Batman for almost 30's years in the public eye. You know what the first live action performance of Batman was? It was dark and brooding not campy and stupid, Lewis Wilson was the first live action performer to get batman right dark brooding and solemn. Batman and Robin (1997) sucked because it was stupid and campy and tried to recreate the Adam West era which also sucked and ruined batman for years. You know who's lighthearted and cheesy? Superman, but no they made him dark and brooding so he'd be more like batman, which doesn't work because Superman is not Batman his costume is bright his villains are campy and he has incredible superpowers. They made this movie back then because they know idiots will go and see it just because it has Batman in it.For people who may say they like to see Batman be funny and they don't like normal batman because they think he's an "emo". Batman is not an emo he witnessed his parents get murdered in front of him and devoted his life to fighting crime doesn't sound very emo to me or funny for that matter. But they don't even mention the tragic pasts of Batman or Robin there just two guys who fight crime for no reason. And this entire show was made to make fun of Batman because the creator never read any Batman comics and he just wanted to make money because people knew about Batman. So in all honesty it is fact that if you like Adam West Batman you hate Batman and are not a real fan you just like a stupid show with horrible writing and jokes bad acting that was made by idiots who didn't know a thing about batman thus by proxy making you an idiot for liking this movie.

More
Richard Chatten
1966/08/06

Incredible as it may seem, it was fifty years ago today that this movie originally premiered at the Paramount Theatre in Austin, Texas on 30 July 1966. It's a substantially different entity from the TV series, to which frankly it doesn't really do justice. The series looks better with each passing year with its clean lines and pristine, saturated colours which more resemble the dynamism and visual clarity of an actual comic strip than the murky recent big screen offerings. Despite the supposedly juvenile demographic of this 'Batman', it has more literate dialogue than any modern superhero movie: could you imagine Christian Bale's Batman possessing the vocabulary to employ a phrase like "human jetsam"?But at 105 minutes the movie feels overstretched and rambling, and I miss the narration by producer William Dozier that was so much part of the TV series. The bigger budget meant the producers could splash out on The Penguin's submarine along with the Batboat, Batcopter, and Batcycle; which came in handy as embellishments to seasons Two & Three, but which for me slow the action down (I find The Penguin's sub very confining during the latter half of the movie, and staging the final punch-up on it's narrow deck feels more cramped than similar showdowns in the TV series; especially as it's obviously shot on the studio tank in front of a painted backdrop of the sky). On the plus side there are none of those endless back stories for each villain that take up so much of more recent Batman movies; although the fact that The Catwoman is already a "known supercriminal" with a long career in larceny already behind her, yet Batman doesn't immediately recognise her at a press conference masquerading as Kitanya Irenya Tatanya Karenska Alisoff of the 'Moscow Bugle' really does strain credibility, even by the standards of an unabashed piece of hokum like this.An incidental advantage the 1966 movie has over both the TV series and the later movies is in the characterisations. In one of the Tim Burton movies Batman casually turns a flamethrower on a few goons; which is really not acceptable conduct for the guy who's supposed to be the Good Guy. This Batman risks his own life to spare a family of ducks; which is as it should be. Adam West spends much more time as Bruce Wayne in the movie than he usually does in the TV series, and as Wayne is permitted a more fiery temperament than Batman ever displays; as when he loses his temper and attempts to head-butt The Riddler. All those narcissistic egos cooped up together on Penguin's submarine also generate friction: I particularly liked The Joker's admonition when it falls to The Riddler to post a ransom demand: "And none of your stupid riddles, do you understand? Make those messages plain!", and the droll nautical exchange between Penguin and two of his goons (probably ad libbed by Meredith), "Yo Ho!" - "Yo Ho What?" - "SIR!".And then there's Lee Meriwether's Catwoman.Julie Newmar being unavailable, Ms Meriwether stepped into Newmar's ankle boots (minus the gold chain and medallion around her neck that Newmar always wore) at the very last minute, and director Leslie Martinson (now 101 years old, by the way) initially had to shoot around her; yet another reason why she actually has so disappointingly little screen time as The Catwoman compared to the interminable Kitka footage. But from this liability a special strength inadvertently derives, and the movie's take on The Catwoman is both unique and closer to the comic strip; never to be repeated.When the movie was made Julie Newmar had so far made only one isolated appearance in Season One; so this represents only The Catwoman's second appearance among the premier league baddies (whereas Gorshin's appearance as The Riddler is almost a swansong; after being nominated for an Emmy he fell out with the producers over money and made only one more appearance in the series in Season Three). Because all the usual lovey-dovey stuff between Batman and The Catwoman that Julie Newmar found so boring is reserved for the scenes with "Miss Kitka", for the first and last time The Catwoman herself is portrayed purely as a ruthless career criminal with her mind firmly on her work and a belligerence far from the flirtatiousness and playful good humour of Newmar and Kitt. (More like a genuine cat in fact.) To this day many people don't get it that the Bruce/Kitka 'romance' is just a ruse by The Catwoman to lure the Caped Crusader into a trap. Furthermore, Newmar deliciously played The Catwoman with the light of madness forever dancing in her eyes, which perfectly complemented that sensational costume she wears; whereas Meriwether by contrast seems superficially more 'normal' - a selfish, humourless cow, but 'normal'. Both Newmar and Kitt seem authentically to have clawed their way from the wrong side of the tracks; but Meriwether has the insolent air of entitlement of a prom queen gone bad, thus cutting a more incongruous figure as a grown woman in the fetish gear Newmar and Kitt seemed born to wear (as worn by them, wet-look black stretch lamé isn't a fabric it's a weapon!), in which Meriwether marches about rather than slinks. Of the three, Meriwether also most resembles those coldly handsome, high-cheekboned harpies that women in comic strips tend to look like.Gorshin's Riddler is obviously headed for an asylum rather than jail when this is all over, with Meriwether's Catwoman the least flamboyantly crazy of the four: just another nasty baddie who belongs in jail. When Bruce Wayne warns the assembled baddies that "I swear by heaven. If you've harmed that girl. I'll kill you all!", unusually for a female adversary The Catwoman is obviously included in this threat. And when finally unmasked and batcuffed, Meriwether's Catwoman reveals herself in her true colours by not showing the slightest flicker of remorse as she is led away pouting to the slammer; unrepentantly heartless & irredeemably evil to the end. Way to Go, Lee!!

More