Home > Adventure >

Wild Wild West

AD:This title is currently not available on Prime Video
Free Trial
View All Sources

Wild Wild West (1999)

June. 30,1999
|
4.9
|
PG-13
| Adventure Action Comedy Western
AD:This title is currently not available on Prime Video
Free Trial
View All Sources

Legless Southern inventor Dr. Arliss Loveless plans to rekindle the Civil War by assassinating President U.S. Grant. Only two men can stop him: gunfighter James West and master-of-disguise and inventor Artemus Gordon. The two must team up to thwart Loveless' plans.

...

Watch Trailer

Free Trial Channels

AD
Show More

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

Phonearl
1999/06/30

Good start, but then it gets ruined

More
Beystiman
1999/07/01

It's fun, it's light, [but] it has a hard time when its tries to get heavy.

More
ChicDragon
1999/07/02

It's a mild crowd pleaser for people who are exhausted by blockbusters.

More
Married Baby
1999/07/03

Just intense enough to provide a much-needed diversion, just lightweight enough to make you forget about it soon after it’s over. It’s not exactly “good,” per se, but it does what it sets out to do in terms of putting us on edge, which makes it … successful?

More
lallhans
1999/07/04

I really can't stand all these wanna be critics anymore complaining about how Hollywood screws up classics but then up rate movies like 2017 "The Mummy" because it's different. Just chill and enjoy it because it's hilarious. And please ignore my at some points bad English. I am German so deal with it.

More
John McOwen
1999/07/05

I love this movie, I've been watching it up and down since I was little. It's just stupid fun with some heartfelt moments in between, nothing more, nothing less. The action is not 'good' - it's fun to watch and the dynamic between the two main protagonists is just perfect.I really don't get the hate. It seems everybody took this movie really seriously... come on, the very first scene should tip everybody off, this is just some stupid over the top movie where you can safely store your higher thinking somewhere in the back of your mind and be content with the silly things you get

More
taqmobile
1999/07/06

I am too young to have watched the original WWW series but as its own entity, the movie was a fun, tongue-in-cheek comedy with funny banter and jabs with a decent CGI robot spider. It is one of those movies I always flip to when I see it in the Guide. Sometimes we just need to accept movies for what they are, not for what they are a spin off of, or what we think they should be. This was a simple comedy, despite the familiar title and characters. I'd like to see a WWW2 personally.Maybe I can get a petition going for another one in this series. I liken this to more of a Men In Black type of fun. I think many people try to relate it to the original and are disappointed.

More
ironhorse_iv
1999/07/07

Yes, I know, a lot of people hate this wastefully-expensive, fluffy comic fantasy and buddy film, but for me, I kinda dig this film. I think the critics were a little harsh on this film. Surprising, it's not as bad, as people make it out to be. Directed by Barry Sonnenfeld and based on the 1965–1969 TV series of the same name by Michael Garrison, the movie tells the story of two government agents, gunslinger James West (Will Smith) & inventor Artemus Gordon (Kevin Kline) who must save President Grant from the clutches of ex-Confederate military engineer turn nineteenth-century super-villain, Dr. Arliss Loveless (Kenneth Branagh). Without spoiling the movie, too much, it's pretty clear, that this movie was made to capitalize on the same success, Sonnenfeld and Smith had with 1997's 'Men in Black'. Instead, of using Sci-fiction comedy, yet again, by making a sequel of that said movie, they choose to go with the hard route, with adapting a TV show, most people in the 1990s, barely heard of, or watch. Having never heard of the show nor the two made-for-TV movie sequels, 1979's 'The Wild Wild West Revisited' and 1980's 'More Wild Wild West', before seeing this film, I can tell you that it didn't take me, out of the movie; yet I can understand, those die-hard fans that did. It's clear, that the movie change a lot of things, when adapting the source material to the big screen. A good example is Dr. Loveless, who went from a dwarf named Miguelito to a man without legs named Arliss. It's clear, that the new character model was created out of the influences of 1964's 'Dr. Strangelove'. I kinda like this change, as it gave the character, a little more reason to be a mad scientist. After all, he's trying to get revenge on the survivors of the war that took away, his means to reproduce. It made him, a lot more memorable. I love the over-the-top acting from Kenneth Branagh, because of that. Another change from the source material is the omission of the hulking giant named Voltaire that use to accomplice him. Instead, we have a series of sexy 'Amazonian' vixens played by Victoria's Secret models and foreign actresses, like Frederique van der Wal, Sofia Eng, Bai Ling, and Musetta Vander. Talk about sex appeal. Also, as much as I love Salma Hayek and her beauty. I found her character to be, somewhat pointless and underused. Her character, Rita Escobar rarely adds anything to the main plot, besides eye candy and love-interest for both the heroes and the villain. Another big chance from the source material was Will Smith as James West. You rarely see black actors in westerns. Turning the original white character to a black character, help build the rivality between them, very well. It also makes somewhat sense within the means of the story as there were many ex-slaves turn cowboys, even if Smith is speaking with some modern slang and dialect. After all, Will Smith's appeal goes a long way toward making up for poor plotting and dialogue. Yet, it's not far enough. There is ton of embarrassing cringe-inducing badly low pace dialogue situations. For example, Smith's dialogue to a white lynch mob about why was he "drumming" on a white lady's boobs was a little too long. Then, there is the scene, where Smith is dancing in drag. It went on, forever. I never want to see that, ever again. Even, the ending was somewhat awkward. Still, unlike the others critics, I thought the on-screen chemistry between Smith's character with that of Kline's character was alright for the most part. Still, Kevin Kline is by far, the weaker of the two main leads. Most of his master of disguises jokes and Freudian slips, kinda does fall flat. Honestly, most of the humor does, regardless of the actor in the film. The movie underwent costly re-shoots in an attempt to inject some humor after it was found that test audiences weren't sure if it was supposed to be a comedy. The movie's humor is clunky. That's bad. However, I did like the large amount of gags, we got from the gadgetry from Gordon and Loveless. It's just funny that producer, Jon Peters insisted so hard, on getting a giant mechanical spider be included in a film. He really does love spiders, as he try to do the same, with the fail film adaptation of the comic book, 'The Sandman' & 'Superman Lives'. In many opinion, while the spider part, seem to come out of nowhere, it was visually well done. The effects, by far, is the most appealing part of the film. The action scenes were fun to watch. During the shooting of several sequences involving stunts and pyrotechnics with the metal spider, a planned building fire grew out of control and quickly overwhelmed the local fire crews that were standing by. Much of the town, they wanted to destroyed by the metal spider, was consumed by the fire. Still, they were able to pull off that sequence, with the rest of the budget, they were given. Another thing that critics might be, a little hard on, this film for, is the opening theme song by Elmer Bernstein. I found it, to be really adventurous and upbeat compare to the original by Richard Markowitz. The TV Show version sounds generic. Nothing really stood out with that song. Also, while, Will Smith's 'Wild Wild West' rap song was sub-par, it was a fun tune to listen to, back in the day. Overall: As entertainment, Wild Wild West is mildly fun to watch. It's not the best, but clearly not, the bad or the ugly. It's more a Mild Mild Mess.

More