4.3.2.1 (2010)

What makes it different from others?

Well Deserved Praise

The acting is good, and the firecracker script has some excellent ideas.

The film never slows down or bores, plunging from one harrowing sequence to the next.

Nothing left unexplained. I had an absolute ball watching. Okay so it flashes back more than a digital camera however something about that amused me and kept me eager to find out how that fits in the sequence. I love the filming technique. I will be the first to admit that I was confused. Thankfully as soon as I thought it didn't make sense I was like "oh, that makes sense, now I get it". Brilliant! I must be a critic, because i critically claim I am glad I watched it. Very complex and covers a lot of hot discussion topics. I really only watched it for Emma but I found that all the cast is pretty good at doing there thing. So if I got mad when Joanne couldn't do her bathroom thing that's understandable right? I don't know what else to say it was a smart film that kept me hyped up and interested in finishing. As soon as it was over I thought, again!? Round of applause keep the Pringles coming!

I had high expectations for this film as I had wanted to see it for ages, and today I finally got round to it. It had a good story-line and some very good actors Roberts and Clarke to name a couple. I thought it was fast paced and kept you wanting to know how all the stories were linked together (which in itself I thought was a good idea.) It had less action and suspense than I was hoping for but I wasn't disappointed by their efforts. I did enjoy it but it wasn't as good as I would have wanted it to be. Overall I would say that 4.3.2.1 is a very good film with some good actors and good story-line. I would rate it 8.5/10 and say that it is suitable for anyone mature 13+.

Hmm I don't know if this those actually contain spoilers but just to be on the safe side I'll say it MAY contain slight spoilers.For those of you who have not watched this movie and are excited about it and also enjoyed Noel Clarkes brilliant movies Kidulthood and Adulthood then all I have to say is Very and Unfortuantly Disappointing.I don't want to make a massive review so here is my opinion short and sweet. The acting no where near remarkable and in some cases I found myself embarrassed for some actors/actress's. Noel Clarke, Adam Deacon are just as brilliant as they were in the 'Hood' movies even though they had much shorter roles. The film was focused on the 4 girls (hence the title). The acting by these four (in my opinion) was sometimes very bad. The lesbian/wannabe Lara Croft character (whoever played her) acted bad.Aside from the on and mainly off acting, the script was also very bad. Sometimes I didn't even understand why certain scenes had any relevance to the story but then I realised the whole story/plot is pretty random.The story is about four girls and there very random messed up three days and this big diamond heist is just something along the side of it (which is a shame). So if your expecting the storyline to be centred on the diamond heist then you may be disappointed when you see yourself watching lesbians having sex while swallowing jelly Viagra.The good points however are that the directing is good, cinematography is good and there are a few funny parts in the movie. Now before I end my review on this movie I would just like to state why I reviewed this movie and that is because a lot of people have said it's similar to Pulp Fiction. SERIOUSLY? It's nothing like it, yes the stories of girls play one at a time and then after one of the girls story is over the film will rewind back to the starting point of another girls story (it'll make more sense when you watch it). But this those not make it similar to the masterpiece Pulp Fiction. Overall the film is pretty poor, It took me a while to decide if the movie deserved a 3/10 but it didn't. It is not as good as Kidulthood and adulthood at all.Excuse my bad grammar or spelling if there is any.

An embarrassment to the long history of great British crime films. With a nod and many unfortunate winks this film is something along the lines of "Snatch" got drunk and shagged "Charlie's Angels" in a parking and this is the off shot.Emma Roberts manages to have some charm. But on the whole this film tries way too hard to be way to cool and even the (Viagra) humor isn't funny. Racial, sexual and ethnic stereotypes abound, while pretending it's just so 'aware' that it's above such contrivances, this film pulls them out a by the baker's dozen in lieu of having any real characters. An idiotic plot (and an oh so stupid ending) devoid of (except maybe the exception of Emma Roberts performance) charm, wit, soul, depth or dialog.Not worth the two hours. Watch "GO" again. Or better yet watch 11:14 they are both structurally similar but so much better.