Attica (1980)

good back-story, and good acting

Good films always raise compelling questions, whether the format is fiction or documentary fact.

The movie turns out to be a little better than the average. Starting from a romantic formula often seen in the cinema, it ends in the most predictable (and somewhat bland) way.

The plot isn't so bad, but the pace of storytelling is too slow which makes people bored. Certain moments are so obvious and unnecessary for the main plot. I would've fast-forwarded those moments if it was an online streaming. The ending looks like implying a sequel, not sure if this movie will get one

I think Emma Goldman noted that every civil war is class war. In this instance, that really rings true. One of the characters in the film notes that 60% of the inmates in Attica were black and 0% of the guards were black. As for the higher-ups of Attica, well, I'll pick my guess at the quotas there.The Attica riot was spectacular: the inmates took over and stood their ground for 22 days until riot police massacred a bunch of inmates and, actually, 10 of the hostages.The film deals with the humane aspects of the take-over in a lot of ways. The legal people mainly think the inmates' demands are valid. The governor is slammed by demands from outsiders, seemingly mainly the people and the police unions. The dilemma is plain to see.I really liked the fact that there's very little soundtrack here. The film ended abruptly, but that's due to the real chain of events. Recommendable because of the humanity.

I was an extra in the movie -- the blond guard who was taken hostage.To answer a previous question, the "nude" scene was not at the end of the movie and was shot as we hostages were driven outside (most of us were nude, but not all) into the yard where about 1,000 other extras were supposed to be trying to kill us while other inmates protected us. We called it the gauntlet when we were filming it. It was cold and muddy and we had to shoot it several times. They gave us bed sheets to wrap up in between takes -- but it was more for warmth than modesty as after the first take, we were pretty muddy head to toe from being pushed around a lot in the mud by 100s of people -- there were about 35 of us playing hostages. We hostages were paid three or four times the regular daily pay for that day and I remember a lot of the movie's big shots had their wives and/or girl friends on the set that day, too.The scene was included in the European release of the movie. I have copies of both.The end was more about the state police just shooting at the inmates sort of randomly and depicting the fact that since many of the police were shooting shotguns, many of the dead and wounded hostages were shot by the police, not inmates.It was hard work... long, long days inside a hospital for the criminally insane... and long stretches of nothing at all to do, as well... lots of hurry up and wait.The movie won a few big awards -- Chomski had just finished Holocaust previous to this movie and was sort of riding that success -- ABC Circle films, I believe.

Just a little note, my brother in law was the foreman on the jury, I still remember seeing his face on T.V. & his mother getting all upset, thinking the inmates or families would come after him. He never did have any problems but one of the other jurors & my brother in law became best friends and are still friends to this day.Strange how bad things can sometimes lead to strange things, like friendship, marriage among others. I now live within a dozen miles from the prison, I have driven past the prison on many occasion, thinking what a scary place it is and how tough you need to be to survive a stint inside the stone walls. I drove my son past one day, explaining about how his uncle was on the jury. I think it frightened him a little bit. I told him to behave or he could end up on the inside! I remember watching the guards in the towers watching me, holding what looked to be M-16 automatic weapons. That was enough to make me turn around and head out of the parking lot and not look back!!

I found this movie floating around on True Movies one afternoon and thought the film sounded interesting i.e. criminals vs cops.The acting was average and nothing special came from anyone including Morgan Freedman. I had to admit I've never seen Freedman looking as young as he did in that movie.The soundtracks were passable to accompany the dangerous moments and the ending. Could of been better.The script could of done with some, "dramatization". It wouldn't of hurt the film to add some more speeches, some little action moments between the criminals and cops. I understand its a true movie and it is trying to reflect the moment of September the 9th 1971, but thats what I think anyway.I have to say I was surprised to see how the ending was. I could not believe the U.S would be as ruthless and dangerous as to line up the guards and start shooting anyone who is not on the floor with their hands behind their back.Good movie with a sad ending.