Home > Horror >

Crazy Eights

AD:This title is currently not available on Prime Video
Free Trial
View All Sources

Crazy Eights (2006)

October. 31,2006
|
3.8
|
R
| Horror
AD:This title is currently not available on Prime Video
Free Trial
View All Sources

Six people are brought together at the funeral of a childhood friend. While settling the estate, they discover a map, which leads them on a search for a time capsule. What they discover reawakens childhood traumas and leads them on a journey through their abandoned childhood home: a home with a terrible secret and a mysterious dead girl who will lead them to their strange fates.

...

Watch Trailer

Free Trial Channels

AD
Show More

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

Matialth
2006/10/31

Good concept, poorly executed.

More
Infamousta
2006/11/01

brilliant actors, brilliant editing

More
CommentsXp
2006/11/02

Best movie ever!

More
Marva-nova
2006/11/03

Amazing worth wacthing. So good. Biased but well made with many good points.

More
djmalone
2006/11/04

This film had so much potential. The actors were great with what they had to work with, the story apart from my main issue was solid. So heres my issue with this movie: I do not understand anything except the attempt to make a really good horror. The fact people like George Romero are successful is simple, he makes HORROR. If you are to make a movie about blood, guts, crazy deaths, graphic scenes then keep it a simple HORROR movie. I don't, like most people, want to have to think why is there clouds popping up, why do we get unexplained flashbacks, why is there revenge on the kids who all went to this place and had the same things done. Surely it would have made more sense to do like a House on Haunted Hill theme, where the Doctor, Assistants and the rest involved in the experiments get pulled to the house or something. This film really, really blows (and not like the ex-porno star in it)...i mean really blows. The fact i spent 10 minutes after bitching and moaning to my wife about how bad this film was means this film took 100 minutes of my LIFE!!! Really this film does not deserve a horror classification, It's a physiological Thriller with content viewers may find offensive (viewer discretion advised) POOP

More
Bob_the_Hobo
2006/11/05

Six friends reunite at the funeral of their friend, after twenty years apart. This friend leaves a map to a time capsule left by all of them at their childhood, bringing all of them to an abandoned, condemned hospital with dark secrets from their past.Hard to describe a film like this, but I ended up really enjoying it. Some great performances by Frank Whaley and the rest, lead by a twisted plot. The hospital is the best part; the lighting and set design make a creepy place for the film to showdown.Some of the other reviews here claim the film had a bad ending, I don't know that I agree. The rest of the film is so vague and bizarre, and as a result the end is a real shock.Worth it for the performances and the story, along with the surprises along the way.

More
Miffy
2006/11/06

Personally i bought this movie expecting a typical 'teen horror' i thought it would be one of those movies all about the blood, typically attractive bad actors, have a lot of pointless sex, action and explosions and that i would enjoy but not remember it, i was proved wrong! from the start i realised this movie had a much deeper meaning in the story, the actors, whilst not the most experienced did a great job! i am not sure if the sort of old fashioned grainy texture to the movie in places was due to low budget or planned but either way it added an eerie creepy effect to the movie.However I have to say , when it comes to the deaths *not giving actual details* it does seem like they were running low on money after the first two... they got a little less shocking and a little more vague...The conclusion to the movie is also very vague, kind of left me asking a lot of questions, i felt as if i got it.. till the end. But i did think, maybe thats what they were going for.I didn't really notice all these major plot holes people are talking about, i think for this movie, any things in it that were mistakes actually added to the phsycological, eerie and unnerving style of the film.Overall i really enjoyed it! give it a chance! but i warn you, don't go into this movie expecting drama and action, it is a more slow and phsycological horror.

More
slayrrr666
2006/11/07

"Crazy Eights" is a potentially good movie undermined by a lot of flaws.**SPOILERS**Following a friend's death, friends Jennifer Jones, (Dina Mayer) Father Lyle Dey, (George Newbern) Gina Conte, (Traci Lords) Beth Patterson, (Gabrielle Anwar) Brent Sykes, (Franky Whaley) and Wayne Morrison, (Dan DeLuca) who have known each other since childhood, gather together to go through the belongings left to them. Despite being initially apprehensive, they go out to an isolated cabin where everything is located and set about looking through the valuables, eventually discovering a strange facility located within. Trying to understand how everything fits together, they realize that all of them were involved in a top-secret project that had experimented on children, including them, and that someone is still there trying to get revenge on them, forcing them to race to find it's secret and stop it.The Good News: There wasn't a whole lot to like with this one. The fact that it starts off with a potentially-promising premise that sounds pretty cool and should-be fun to occur. It's quite unique, about the experimentations going on and it does have a ring of plausibility about it, one of those areas that could've happened in the past and really could've been done, making it all that much better. The fact that the locations on display, when we can see them, are pretty creepy is a plus. The giant bunker underground looks really creepy when we get to see it, being large, spacious and, in one of the highlight moments where we follow one of them who goes in circles trying to get out only to arrive back at the same spot, is inspired and ingenious, full of great shots and really makes for one of the creepiest times in the film. Another minor one, where the professor has the flickering images pop-up on the video-screen after the classroom lecture is really nice, considering it's unknown what's happening then and it doesn't take an eternity to get through like the others shortly after. The last good plus here is the fact that there's some nice deaths in here, when it gets around to knocking them off. One is impaled through the neck with a spear-on-the-wall, another is stabbed with a glass shard, one has their leg broken in a fall down stairs, one has a windowsill closed on their neck and another rips their eyes out, so this one has some gore. Otherwise, it's all that's good here.The Bad News: This one here can only be called a major disappointment, as there isn't too much good stuff here. One of the many problems is that there's hardly any real interest going on at the beginning of the film concerning what's going on. Despite the fact that they meet together to discuss the funeral, yet it's just so dull and lifeless that it hardly gets anything going. From an abundance of failed scares, such as whatever was happening to the sculptor as that scene lasted an eternity while she kept smoothing out a piece muttering to herself yet not once was there a clear revelation of what she was making or why that was a scary situation to be in, or the haunting of the priest in the rectory as he spent another eternity searching for something making noise off the distance, yet because of the way it's edited, it appears that he's looking for the source of the music playing over the scene. That the film then proceeds to spend close to ten minutes with them all talking to each other about the significance of it, with no resolution only to suddenly throw out an idea that no one made a trail to so that it seemed logical, and then even more wandering around in an area so dark it renders the hopeful-suspense moot before finally finding the underground bunker that leads to even more time wandering around. Half of the movie is literally devoted to wandering around the different locations spouting off the same thing about trying to find out why they're there and what it all means. This makes it incredibly difficult to get into the film and take anything about it in any way, shape or form seriously, meaning the whole thing is just deadly dull. Another big flaw here is the film's lack of explanation for what exactly happened at the bunker in the finale. The film just had a bunch of actions carried out, including some gruesome deaths, then just ended without really saying what happened. It makes no clues as to whether it was a ghost, one of them, or what, and the stopping suddenly without explanations tactic isn't comforting. The last flaw to this one is that, because of the amount of time spent elsewhere, most of the big revelations concerning the story occur at the very end. The reason for naming the group as such, what happened to them to get to know each other, what was happening to them, left unexplained until the last half-hour of the film, rendering them of their importance and making it seem as though the film had forgotten about them. It's not a good feeling to have, and these here are what's wrong with the film.The Final Verdict: This wasn't all-out bad, as there's a nice amount of potential on display, but fails mainly into the disappointment area. Really only seek this one out if you're a fan of the cast or feel the need to complete the series, otherwise those who know this isn't something for them are advised to ignore.Rated R: Graphic Language and Violence

More