Inconceivable (2017)

Did you people see the same film I saw?

Absolutely brilliant

I think this is a new genre that they're all sort of working their way through it and haven't got all the kinks worked out yet but it's a genre that works for me.

The plot isn't so bad, but the pace of storytelling is too slow which makes people bored. Certain moments are so obvious and unnecessary for the main plot. I would've fast-forwarded those moments if it was an online streaming. The ending looks like implying a sequel, not sure if this movie will get one

This was a 'Lifetime' drama meant for bored people needing a boost in the afternoon. Seriously. And with Nick...the lack of personality and movement was so so so disappointing. He seemed bored and overwhelmed by the female leads. They just swallowed him up. (His hair was utterly unprofessional given the role) The women did a decent job. Okay one scene was a bit too ridiculous, the outburst at a baby shower - but I made it through.The Lab tech guy could not have been more wooden. He really couldn't have been. Who was this guy? And wow, after a C section evil woman is just up and moving around like it was all nothing. OH my gosh, I'm starting to ramble as all sorts of scenes come to mind; time to stop.It's a time waster, don't expect too much.

Yes, this type of concept has been done a lot people... but it seriously made me smile, cry a little, and get scared as hell in moments! There was some unexpected parts, and I think Gina and Nic did a wonderful job acting...well, everyone did really....I absolutely hate the crazy lady...but that means she did her job well. I think this movie is certainly worth the watch. I'm not going to put any detailed spoilers... just give it a shot. I liked it a lot but honestly some parts really made me want to look away because I couldn't handle what was happening to the female lead. I'm giving this a 10 to up the damn IMDB rating... it should be at least a 6/7 out of 10. I personally think it is an 8.

You will note several ten-star reviews, clearly written by the director or his cronies. So, skip those - how do I know this? Because this is what they do - and no one could be that stupid as to give this film ten stars. Then he has thousands of his nearest and dearest friends upvote it on the main page.There is no need to pontificate on how bad this film - the script is horrible, the photography is digital (and I don't mean that as a positive), and I can't feel for Nicolas Cage because he obviously enjoys the dough and likes working. Faye Dunaway was clearly bamboozled by the moron director - clearly. She should, at this point, take a leaf from Jane Fonda's book and attempt to not slum. Because when you slum like this, no one will hire you to do something worthwhile. BTW, the "director" described this to the press as a comeback role for her. Uh huh. She has maybe six minutes of screen time.Gina Gershon, as others point out, gives it her all, but I've never thought much of her all and even if she were Meryl Streep there is simply nothing to be done with either the character or the insufferable dialogue. I found Nicky Whelan ever so annoying, all schmacting all the time. So where does all this end up? Correct, the director, someone named Jonathan Baker. a) he is a terrible director. b) he is a terrible director, and c) he is also a terrible actor who put himself in this film. Oh, and d) he is a terrible director and, having read up on him, a man of limitless chutzpah and ego. What else is new? The man's claim to fame is The Amazing Race. He has exactly five acting credits, one feature film credit (this one) and that's it. So how exactly did he bamboozle these actors and the people who funded the film? Well, apparently he has money from somewhere - his wife perhaps? Family? Because apparently he put in a million bucks of his own money. Well, that's one way to direct a film. He's also apparently funding a documentary about - him. I'm not making this up, folks. This guy is everything that's wrong with the movies today and hopefully after the failure of this wretched film we will not be subjected to another film from him. The film cost twelve million dollars with, I'm sure, a good deal of that going to the actors he "bought". Certainly none of it went into the filming, which took fifteen days. Who can blame Mr. Cage for taking a large check like that? Or Ms. Dunaway? Or Ms. Gershon? And the film's gross? Under $300,000. So, a complete and utter disaster. I found exactly two legit reviews - the LA Times and the Hollywood Reporter - both hugely negative as they should be - sorry, Mr. Baker, money can't buy that for you. Shame on you and shame on everyone involved. Learn how to read a script and just say no. Learn anything, but stop wasting people's time.Finally, to the morons and friends of the director who loved the "twist" at the end - what twist? There was no twist at the end. Just shameless lying by the screenwriter/director to get you to believe one thing when another is true. That's not a twist, that's idiocy. And there you have it.

A mother looks to escape her abusive past by moving to a new town where she befriends another mother, who grows suspicious of her. Inconceivable has the same plot like every other movie about abusing past and troubled minds and it does it more poorly than other films i'm afraid. The acting isn't exactly Oscar Worthy but it's not bad either considering the name 'Nicolas Cage' but the terrible plot and pacing make for an Inconceivable movie i'm afraid. (0/10)